Introduction to the Middle Way combines the timeless devotional-scholarly poetry of Indian master Chandrakirti (ca. seventh century) with the exhaustive explanation of its meaning by Jamgön Mipham (1846–1912), whose commentary was composed eleven centuries after Chandrakirti lived. Chandrakirti is one of several Indian thinkers whose treatises were brought to Tibet and whose realized teachings about the nature of the mind are the foundation of Tibetan Buddhist thought. Hidden in his verses are the guideposts to enlightenment, composed in this way to help those students who have received instruction to commit it to memory. Mipham's commentary, presented in thorough outline form, offers a point-by-point explanation of Chandrakirti's meaning.
[A] khenpo of Nālandā Mahāvihāra and a disciple of Nāgārjuna and a commentator on his works and those of his main disciple, Āryadeva. Candrakīrti was the most famous member of what the Tibetans came to call the dbU-ma thal-'gyur, an approach to the interpretation of Madhyamaka philosophy sometimes back-translated into Sanskrit as Prāsaṅgika Madhyamaka or rendered in English as the "Consequentialist" or "Dialecticist" school.
Beautiful book and an excellent introduction to Chandrakirti's fascinating thought, with very clear and understandable commentary by Mipham Rinpoche. While Chandrakirti's work should of course be read and enjoyed in its dialectical entirety, there are verses scattered throughout the volume which flicker like small gems. The famous chapter six contains (among many other things) a beautiful explication of Nagarjuna's arguments against inherent causality and an extensive, analytical criticism of yogacara, while chapter eleven (which closes the text) is quite esoteric, consisting of poetic analogies which attempt to fathom a Buddha's inconceivable powers, while also paradoxically containing a passage which seems to deny the existence of the Buddha's mind,
"11.17 The tinder of phenomena is all consumed, And this is peace, the dharmakaya of the Conquerors. There is no origin and no cessation. The mind is stopped, the kaya manifests.
11.18 This peaceful kaya, radiant like the wish-fulfilling tree, Is like the wishing jewel that without forethought lavishes The riches of the world on beings till they gain enlightenment. [nirvana? boddhi?] It is perceived by those who are beyond conceptual construction." (page 99, ebook edition)
Jan Westerhoff sometimes paraphrases Chandrakirti (in this interpretation) as positing that "there is nothing what it's like to be a Buddha".
Mipham's commentary also contains an astute and enjoyable polemic against the Svatantrika interpretation of Madhyamaka,
"The conclusion at which they [the Svatantrika] arrive, therefore—namely, that a man is not empty of himself but of a true existence extraneous to him—strikes them as a highly satisfactory solution. This, however, drives a wedge between the two truths; and conventional phenomena, existing according to their characteristics, end up by not being empty. Indeed, they become truly existent. Failing to understand this crucial point, our opponents say that phenomena lack true existence, but all the time they are whispering to themselves: “How can things really lack true existence?” Chandrakirti said that the Svatantrikas were content with tenets that are only verbally coherent. The very same criticism applies here to our opponents." (page 176, ebook edition)
Recommended to all those who wish to enter the Middle Way.
This is a 15th century commentary on a 2nd century text translated in the 21 century into English. The root text is likely one of the most complicated or esoteric philosophical ideas of the last two millenium. It's like taking your brain apart and putting it back together piece by piece. Be careful when you dip into this casual text.
"The relative and the ultimate do not exclude each other; and it should be understood that it is precisely due to their own nature (emptiness) that conventional phenomena are able to appear." p. 214 Wonderful! :)
While I found the first half of the book with the commentary of Chandrakirti’s Madhyamakavatara relevant and useful, the rest of the text is long-winded poorly structured notes. The book could be condensed.