The Internet is facilitating a generational transition within America's advocacy group system. New "netroots" political associations have arisen in the past decade and play an increasingly prominent role in citizen political mobilization. At the same time, the organizations that mediate citizen political engagement and sustained collective action are changing. They rely upon modified staff structures and work routines. They employ novel strategies and tactical repertoires. Rather than "organizing without organizations," the new media environment has given rise to "organizing through different organizations." The MoveOn Effect provides a richly detailed analysis of this disruptive transformation. It highlights changes in membership and fundraising regimes - established industrial patterns of supporter interaction and revenue streams - that were pioneered by MoveOn.org and have spread broadly within the advocacy system. Through interviews, content analysis, and direct observation of the leading netroots organizations, the book offers fresh insights into 21st century political organizing.
The book highlights important variations among the new organizations - including internet-mediated issue generalists like MoveOn, community blogs like DailyKos.com, and neo-federated groups like DemocracyforAmerica.com. It also explores a wider set of netroots infrastructure organizations that provide supporting services to membership-based advocacy associations. The rise of the political netroots has had a distinctly partisan conservatives have repeatedly tried and failed to build equivalents to the organizations and infrastructure of the progressive netroots. The MoveOn Effect investigates these efforts, as well as the late-forming Tea Party movement, and introduces the theory of Outparty Innovation Incentives as an explanation for the partisan adoption of political technology. Written by a political scientist who is also a longtime political organizer, The MoveOn Effect offers a widely-accessible account of the Internet's impact on American politics. Operating at the intersection of practitioner and academic knowledge-traditions, Karpf provides a reassessment of many longstanding claims about new media and citizen political engagement.
Especially for those not already steeped in Netroots culture, Karpf's book can serve as an excellent primer. It focuses on a good range of "online" or "internet mediated" players, describing their origins, functions and distinct roles. Definitely worth reading, but with a few caveats:
The first is stylistic. The book is drawn from Karpf's doctoral dissertation, and still reads very much like one. The language is rife with jargon, and a good deal of the work focuses on discussing developments in the context of academic social theory. At points it can also be maddeningly redundant.
More substantively, when Karpf is comparing new organizing efforts to previous (or "legacy" as he terms them) organizations, other than references to academic studies he bases his observations almost entirely on his experience with a very narrow type of group: the Sierra Club and its model of advocacy based on a mass membership developed through direct mail. We're missing, then, almost any discussion of community-based organizations working face-to-face with their members. This is a significant drawback.