ADVANCED READER COPY REVIEW
This is the sixth in Helen Durrants "Victim" series, featuring her Detective Rachel King...despite having downloaded the first book, oddly called "Next Victim", I'd not previously read it...for the purpose of review I thought I should now do that before getting "Lost" in the latest release.
I'm glad that I did - there's a central premise that's a little hard to believe (main character secretly shares a child with Manchester's biggest villain) - but it's a well crafted opening story, which had me scratching my head early doors over "coincidence" but then neatly were the joins connected to form an overall satisfying narrative...
So, skipping stories 2 - 5 how does the ”Lost Victim" stand up?
Ok...first impressions, pre-release information tells us that Rachel now has a toddler son, and when she arrives in the book (Chapter 2) we are told this is her first day back after spending three months "effectively in witness protection", so there are certainly gaps to be filled in BUT do they devalue our enjoyment of this book as a stand-alone?
For me they do because early confirmation of the boys parentage puts it into perspective - the incongruity of the first book relationship must have got deeper...more people know, and that surely would be career limiting at the very least...in the real world such a relationship could not be tolerated, so this will colour my review, negatively...would a major villains "redemption" and subsequent reinvolvement in major crime be overlooked this easily? Stretches my gullibility a little too far...as with the first book the mere mention of his name distracts her - must make her dysfunctional surely?
Chapter 8 and she's asking herself similar questions, for what I suspect are connected reasons (a lot appears to have happened in what appears to be three, possibly four years - based on eldest daughter being in first year of college in "Next" and first year at Uni in "Lost"...)...ex husband's been bought out of the "shared" cottages, ex con gifted the deeds to Rachel...another red herring as surely the source of those funds must be questionable, or am I too picky? Ex husband has a new partner and they're happy to child mind the toddler...I must just know unkind people as this again stretches credibility for me - which is a shame as there's a decent story brewing with a suspect vicar taking threatening phone calls...I'd sooner not have the distraction of what I take to be an impossible relationship enveloping the lead character 😔
28% in and the major villain himself hasn't been involved BUT there are numerous references to those that filled the void during his redemption, including those involved in activities leading to Rachel's virtual witness protection - fair enough as a tempter to go back and read the book(s) but annoying when prior information might be better provided for a first time reader (Chapter 14, a names dropped as "new gangster on the block" ...nothing backing it up, not even a reference to previous tales...might be immaterial, might be a head scratcher...delete that, it is a head scratched here...especially as he and his wife are involved in the opening Chapter before we get into the murder investigation...might have made more sense if I could have joined the dots earlier based on prior knowledge?
So Chapter 14/15 and Rachel's employing an au-pair, recommended by her non villainous ex-husband and his new partner...quite how they have come to know this girl who we've only met as a trafficked immigrant kept in virtual slavery by someone we now know to be an aspirant biggest villain in Manchester hasn't been explained...BUT once again our focus point DCI is integrating with the higher echelons of Mancunian criminality - and my irritation that this is continuing the unconvincing backstory theme is beginning to build...might be a necessary plot device but for me it rankles as a plot device too far, spoiling my enjoyment of the book...review star lost
Chapter 27 and Rachel's come home to an unexpectedly empty house - she phones her younger daughter to be told the au-pair had fed her around four, two pages later the nosey neighbour says she'd been in a noisy argument and driven off with some white van men an hour earlier...the cover blurb say this is a gripping mystery with a massive twist...unless it's time travel another review star's dropped!
Chapter 29 and on the morning briefing a statements made that the au-pair was set to work in a villains house - there has been nothing to date to make that leap...we the reader can summise it ONLY on the basis of the name Sofia - a body found earlier of a well dressed, though murdered, vagrant MIGHT be the original Sofia after all - again nothings occurred in the story to determine this as evidential fact....another review star dropped - only two left and almost half a book to go...this isn't good - I'm going to crack on and finish my read this afternoon in the hope that better things are to come.
Chapter 31 and another massive incongruity...one of Rachel's DC's is checking some background on the murdered girl - we'd been told previously that she'd been arrested one evening along with "Ronan", a low ranking wannabe BUT here we have corroboration about her being checked in with Arlo, who is allegedly higher up the food chain, and described by the gentleman who told the original tale of the arrest as someone who wouldn't be happy that his drug runners had been picked up...the scale of incongruity in the narrative is just not good enough - I'm down to a single star and looking forward to closing this one out.
Chapter 34, Sofia confesses that she'd been copying Rachel's notes about the case and passing them to villains...but she's going to be given a second chance at child minding for Rachel DESPITE her fake CV and references...she also ID's the dead girl from ”the only image they had (which) was of the dead girls body", completely forgetting they had a photo found in her jacket pocket which also included a half facial of a chap which might yet be useful in the narrative, otherwise why put it there? good question as its not come up again...give me strength!
Finally hit the epilogue, mainly wrapped up the why's and wherefores, and Sofia, the "trafficked" girl is booking a flight home from DCI Rachels home...now, call me picky, BUT I wasn't aware that illegals got to retain their passports - aren't they held over by the bastards taking advantage of them AND given that she's an officer of the law shouldn't Rachel be more bothered that she's assisting an illegal, oh no, of course she rubs shoulders with Manc Pondlife - final spoiler, complete "Act of God" solution given when the original bad boy pops up in Rachel's kitchen on two evenings when the house is actually being "protected" by uniformed officers, and tells her "whodunnit"... Single Star justified for perseverance alone as this book/series is littered with unbelievable happenings and poor scripting...I won't be at the front of the queue to review Book 7 that's for sure - though there's a chance to stop the series here and now, I'd recommend taking it, sorry!