Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Complete Works of William Shakespeare Volume III

Rate this book
Sen nocy letniej; Kupiec wenecki

Paperback

Published January 1, 1988

3 people are currently reading
64 people want to read

About the author

William Shakespeare

27.7k books47k followers
William Shakespeare was an English playwright, poet, and actor. He is widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language and the world's pre-eminent dramatist. He is often called England's national poet and the "Bard of Avon" (or simply "the Bard"). His extant works, including collaborations, consist of some 39 plays, 154 sonnets, three long narrative poems, and a few other verses, some of uncertain authorship. His plays have been translated into every major living language and are performed more often than those of any other playwright. Shakespeare remains arguably the most influential writer in the English language, and his works continue to be studied and reinterpreted.
Shakespeare was born and raised in Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire. At the age of 18, he married Anne Hathaway, with whom he had three children: Susanna, and twins Hamnet and Judith. Sometime between 1585 and 1592, he began a successful career in London as an actor, writer, and part-owner ("sharer") of a playing company called the Lord Chamberlain's Men, later known as the King's Men after the ascension of King James VI and I of Scotland to the English throne. At age 49 (around 1613), he appears to have retired to Stratford, where he died three years later. Few records of Shakespeare's private life survive; this has stimulated considerable speculation about such matters as his physical appearance, his sexuality, his religious beliefs, and even certain fringe theories as to whether the works attributed to him were written by others.
Shakespeare produced most of his known works between 1589 and 1613. His early plays were primarily comedies and histories and are regarded as some of the best works produced in these genres. He then wrote mainly tragedies until 1608, among them Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet, Othello, King Lear, and Macbeth, all considered to be among the finest works in the English language. In the last phase of his life, he wrote tragicomedies (also known as romances) and collaborated with other playwrights.
Many of Shakespeare's plays were published in editions of varying quality and accuracy during his lifetime. However, in 1623, John Heminge and Henry Condell, two fellow actors and friends of Shakespeare's, published a more definitive text known as the First Folio, a posthumous collected edition of Shakespeare's dramatic works that includes 36 of his plays. Its Preface was a prescient poem by Ben Jonson, a former rival of Shakespeare, that hailed Shakespeare with the now famous epithet: "not of an age, but for all time".

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
11 (50%)
4 stars
5 (22%)
3 stars
6 (27%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Bill FromPA.
703 reviews47 followers
May 30, 2018
Henry IV, Part 1 11/4-5
Henry IV, Part 2 11/9-10
The Merry Wives of Windsor 11/17-18
Henry V 11/20
As You Like It 12/6
Hamlet 12/10-12

Hamlet - After all that’s been written and said about the play, it’s probably impossible for anyone to come up with anything original and reasonable to say about Hamlet. That said, the following ideas derive mainly from my reading of the text; I’m not aware of any general or specific interpretations quite like this, though I suspect the ideas have likely been previously suggested by others.

I see similarities between Hamlet and Prince Hal in the Henry IV plays. As Hal is seen as being divided between two father figures, King Henry and Falstaff, so Hamlet is torn between modeling himself on his father and his admired friend Horatio. In both plays, too, the spiritual heir of the king appears to fall outside the direct bloodline with Hotspur and Fortinbras.

Old Hamlet was a warlord, a man of violent action; he took “arms against a sea of troubles”: where the world did not conform to his will, he attempted to shape it to his will be physical force. Horatio is “a scholar”, a man of thought and understanding, an advocate, like Brutus, of stoicism; he masters his own will in order to live with equanimity in the world as it is. He is the man who “could be bounded in a nutshell and count myself a king of infinite space” (a line only in the Folio text). Old Hamlet wished to master the world, or at least as much of it as came within reach of his truncheon; Horatio seeks to master only himself.

The question of the extent to which Hamlet identifies with Horatio is highlighted by a difference between the Second Quarto (Q2) and Folio (F) versions of one of the play’s most famous lines. Q2 has:
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
The same passage in F is:

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in our philosophy.
A note to the Arden Shakespeare suggests that “your” in Q2 may not in fact refer to Horatio, but be a generic term of address, as in the gravedigger’s “your water is a sore decayer of your whoreson dead body.” Given the direct address to his friend, however, I don’t find this interpretation persuasive.
In Act 5 Hamlet, after the abortive trip to England on which he has subverted the King’s plot against his life and dealt with pirates, seems, with his praise of “rashness”, to have chosen his father as his model, determining to act on his will as opportunity offers. The psychological foundation for this resolution is found before his journey, however, in Q2’s Act 4 soliloquy, “How all occasions do inform against me”.

Hamlet’s wrestling with the idea of suicide may be a result of his exposure to Horatio’s “philosophy”, but I have quite a problem coming to terms with Horatio’s own brief, but apparently sincere, resolution to commit suicide with the dregs of the King’s poison after the general slaughter in Act 5 (“I am more an antique Roman than a Dane. / Here’s yet some liquor left.”) It seems totally unjustified, and not at all in character for someone described “As one in suffering all that suffers nothing, / A man that Fortune’s buffets and rewards / Hast ta’en with equal thanks.” Unless the relationship between Hamlet and Horatio is much deeper than I understood it, or than I can recall ever seeing it portrayed, I just cannot understand why Horatio should consider suicide at this point. His only other allusion to suicide is in Act 1 of Q2, where he seems to consider it a mental aberration, “toys of desperation”, in warning Hamlet what might happen if he follows the ghost
What if it tempt you toward the flood, my lord,
Or to the dreadful summit of the cliff
That beetles o'er his base into the sea,
And there assume some other horrible form
Which might deprive your sovereignty of reason
And draw you into madness? Think of it:
The very place puts toys of desperation,
Without more motive, into every brain
That looks so many fathoms to the sea
And hears it roar beneath.
On this reading I came to see Horatio as an important character in the play. Dramatically, he is Hamlet’s only trusted confidant, thus giving the occasion for some exposition and revelation of the prince’s character outside the soliloquies. He also seems to be the representative of the Renaissance in the medieval Danish court, thus the source, if not the enactor, of ideas destabilizing to the established order.
The Arden Shakespeare includes an appendix on the doubling of roles in the play, where they find that the three roles that cannot be doubled, except in very trivial ways, are Hamlet (no surprise), the Queen, and Horatio. The revealed importance of the last role seems to have surprised the editors themselves.
It may be worth quoting in full Hamlet’s praise of his friend from act 3:
HAMLET
Horatio, thou art e’en as just a man
As e’er my conversation coped withal.
HORATIO
O, my dear lord—
HAMLET
Nay, do not think I flatter,
For what advancement may I hope from thee
That no revenue hast but thy good spirits
To feed and clothe thee? Why should the poor be flattered?
No, let the candied tongue lick absurd pomp
And crook the pregnant hinges of the knee
Where thrift may follow fawning. Dost thou hear?
Since my dear soul was mistress of her choice
And could of men distinguish, her election
Hath sealed thee for herself. For thou hast been
As one in suffering all that suffers nothing,
A man that Fortune’s buffets and rewards
Hast ta’en with equal thanks; and blessed are those
Whose blood and judgment are so well commeddled
That they are not a pipe for Fortune’s finger
To sound what stop she please. Give me that man
That is not passion’s slave, and I will wear him
In my heart’s core, ay, in my heart of heart,
As I do thee.
The contrast with his interactions with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern is interesting; in both cases, Hamlet mentions their relationship to Fortune.
The only conjecture I have about Horatio’s suicidal impulse in the last act is to imagine that he is, in fact, in love with Hamlet and finds the thought of life without him unbearable. The suicidal gesture comes before Hamlet has given his “dying voice” to Fortinbras as the next monarch, so I can’t say it’s the prospect of the new regime that inspires it, though it could be argued that the Norwegian prince is the likely candidate even before Hamlet’s endorsement.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.