The title seems like something I would have been interested in, but properly academic writing makes everything dull. I recall this not at all! I can't even give it a rating.
My notes say: lines of inquiry from Gibbon on Roman toleration of religion/superstition Did Rome really promote/enforce religious liberalism? According to Roman public opinion, Rome published magic because magic was effective, not because it was superstitious. Gibbon's England was not tolerant and was superstitious.