As with the previous volume, this volume contains stories that were ghost written while Eisner was serving in the U.S. Army during World War II. While this collection makes a better effort to try and use the comic form, those subbing for Eisner are not nearly as visionary when utilizing the comic form, and as such, the stories may start with an interesting premise, but almost always devolve into the Spirit completely anticipating the criminals actions and it turning into a punch-fest at the end with the Spirit, with his trusty sidekick Ebony White by his side, victorious. In addition at some point in 1944, a decision was made to cut the comic from 8 pages to 7--Eisner himself felt limited by just the 8 pages available, so cutting the amount of real estate the ghost writers and artists had was yet another limitation. But in the Spirit Archives reviews I have done, I haven't addressed Ebony White.
So let's address the problem of Ebony White.
For as forward thinking as Eisner was in how the comic medium could be used to its maximum potential for storytelling, his portrayal of Ebony is a horribly stereotypical black minstrel type, who often bumbles his way into being heroic, sometimes getting out of the jam on his own, but often times needing the help of the Spirit in the process. Eisner himself knew that Ebony was problematic, but apparently received both messages of criticism and support about the character. In addition, while Ebony looks stereotypical, Ebony is the focus of many of the early Spirit stories and thus both Eisner and the ghost writers of the WWII-era strips are able to explore his character. The real issue for me is that comics, at their core, are still a graphical medium first and foremost, and by casting Ebony as a stereotypical "darkie," the damage is already done. And while someone could make the argument that Eisner and his publishers should not be held to account for such a character, I think that's bullshit. Eventually Eisner got rid of the character in 1949 and had non stereotypical African-Americans in the strip afterward. He knew it was wrong. I commend him for doing this years before Brown v. The Board of Education and the Civil Rights Act, but he still did it. And as much as there are those in the world that would like you to think that Jim Crow and segregationism was somehow okay, just because "those were the times," those are usually attitudes coming from privileged white people who tend to benefit from these things.
I could probably wax philosophical about Ebony White forever, but the truth is that I'm sure even the young Eisner (he was 23 when Ebony first appeared) did not have the wherewithal to question his choice in his portrayal of Ebony. Eventually he did, and the character was put to pasture. Was that the right choice? Does it make sense to portray Ebony as a street-wise urchin as Darwyn Cooke later did or just to ignore it ever happened? I wish I had those answers.