@font-face {: "Times New Roman"; }@font-face {: "Arial"; }@font-face {: "Verdana"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { 0in 0in 0.0001pt; 12pt; Courier; }table.MsoNormalTable {: 10pt; "Times New Roman"; }div.Section1 { Section1; }ol { 0in; }ul { 0in; }An applied approach to understanding bond markets. Through its applied approach, Fabozzi's "Bond Markets" prepares readers to analyze the bond market and manage bond portfolios without getting bogged down in the theory. This edition has been streamlined and updated with new content, and features overall enhancements based on @font-face {: "Times New Roman"; }@font-face {: "Verdana"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { 0in 0in 0.0001pt; 12pt; Courier; }table.MsoNormalTable {: 10pt; "Times New Roman"; }div.Section1 { Section1; }ol { 0in; }ul { 0in; }previous editions' reader and instructor feedback.
Frank J. Fabozzi is a Professor in the Practice of Finance and Becton Fellow in the Yale School of Management. He is well known as the author of numerous books on finance, both practitioner-focused and academic. Professor Frank J. Fabozzi will be joining Edhec Risk Institute on August 1, 2011. EDHEC-Risk Institute is part of EDHEC Business School, one of Europe’s leading business schools.
This is like the gold standard reference for fixed income securities. I used a version of this in undergraduate and when I retook the course in graduate school, they used the exact same text to go into the subject matter in more detail. Fabozzi's texts are well known in fixed income securities.
Traditional bond analysts differ greatly from loan analysts. The latter focus mainly on the quality performance of individual loans. Thus, in depth research of individuals or individual companies are conducted. However, for a portfolio manager, his job isn't focusing on the due diligence of the individual companies (they often outsource that to the rating agencies), rather, they use mathematical equations to calculate the likelihood of the performance of such bond compare to other instruments. Which means in sum, the loan officer who are prudent in picking the better performing bond would have higher margin of safty than a bond profolio manager, since the ladder cares more about a group of securities not hand picking individual ones.