"This book is endlessly enlightening and entertaining . . . will appeal to all dog owners." ―Ann LaFarge, Taconic News
How do dogs think? Short of breeding a talking dog (not as impossible as it sounds), the best we can do is to carefully observe and record their behavior. And after a decade of research, the internationally renowned ethologist Vilmos Csányi has brilliantly captured the high degree of mutual understanding and empathy that exists between humans and their proverbial best friends.
Drawing in part on close observations of his own dogs, Flip and Jerry, Csányi argues that the long-standing alliance of dogs and humans arose from the problem-solving and communications skills evident in wolves, from which all modern dogs are descended. These basic intellectual skills were refined and enhanced as dogs and humans evolved together over tens of thousands of years. And because dogs were bred to be mankind's helpmates, the dog owner who knows what to look for can interpret their thoughts, desires, and motivations.
Csányi Vilmos Széchenyi-díjas magyar biológus, biokémikus, etológus, egyetemi tanár, a Magyar Tudományos Akadémia rendes tagja, a Magyar Tudomány volt főszerkesztője. Kutatási területe az állati és emberi viselkedés, valamint a biológiai és a kulturális evolúció kérdései. Tudományterjesztési és szépirodalmi munkássága is jelentős.
1953-ban érettségizett, majd felvették az Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem Természettudományi Kar vegyész szakára. Itt szerzett 1958-ban vegyészdiplomát. Ennek megszerzése után a Budapesti Orvostudományi Egyetem (később Semmelweis Orvostudományi Egyetem) Orvosi Vegytani Intézete munkatársa lett. 1964-ben kapta meg adjunktusi kinevezését. 1973-ban visszatért az ELTE Természettudományi Karára, ahol a magatartásgenetikai laboratóriumban kezdett dolgozni egyetemi tanári beosztásban. Később az általa szervezett etológia tanszék vezetője lett. 1993-tól a posztgraduális etológia kurzus programvezetője. A tanszéket 2000-ig vezette. 2005-ben professor emeritusi címet kapott. Itt etológiát, humánetológiát, magatartásgenetikát és rendszerelméletet oktat. Egyetemi állásai mellett az MTA és az ELTE Összehasonlító Etológiai Kutatócsoportjának vezetője. 2011-ben Szilárd Leó professzori ösztöndíjban részesült. Összesen két évet töltött az Amerikai Egyesült Államokban, először a Harvard Egyetemen, majd a New York State Research Institute for Neurochemistryben mint vendégkutató.
Al bij al een zeer aangenaam en interessant werk. Sommige commentatoren verwijten het een gebrek aan "wetenschappelijkheid" of een teveel aan antropomorfisme, maar... laat ons eerlijk wezen, honden zijn totaal gedomesticeerde wezens die in complete symbiose leven met de mensen. En laat ons het eens vanuit holistisch standpunt bekijken: is het werkelijk mogelijk een "objectief" beeld te krijgen van de geest van een hond door middel van geïsoleerde en zogenaamd wetenschappelijk opgezette experimenten in een laboratorium? En dat terwijl diezelfde honden in feite omzeggens alles leren vanuit hun samen leven met mensen? Ik dacht het niet. Waarmee ik de waarde van dat wetenschappelijk onderzoek niet wil minimaliseren... maar de mix van anekdotische verhalen en wetenschappelijke experimenten die Vilmos Csanyi ons hier aanbiedt, is in mijn ogen zeer waardevol. Wie of wat een hond is, wordt grotendeels bepaald door zijn baasjes, zijn leef- en/of werkomgeving, zijn ervaringen... anders gezegd, net zoals voor een mens is de combinatie van nature en nurture bepalend voor het gedrag en het karakter van de hond, en dat maakt dit werk zeer duidelijk.
I actually quit the book while on the last section. The third part came with a warning. It was all research. Very little entertainment. I love dogs, but didn't learn anything about them. I feel like any dog parent will have had the same experiences themselves. Well written regardless
For someone who is a canine ethologist, I feel like most of Csanyi's statements about dogs are backed up with very little science. The stories he tells about his dogs are charming, but they strike me as extremely anthropomorphic and difficult if not impossible to prove. (One example: He claims that a dachshund who was best friends with a rabbit refused to eat rabbit stew for the rest of his life, in deference to his rabbit friend. Umm. Unlikely.) There are some interesting studies in here -- I particularly liked the one on seeing-eye dogs and how they tend to make decisions for their handlers -- but overall, the book was a rather confused jumble of animal stories and dog anecdotes. The translation also read in a very stiff and stilted way. I, of course, have no idea how it would have read in Hungarian.
Vilmos Csanyl does a great job of explaining the science of animal behavior (ethology) in terms that a person from any background could understand. The examples that were provided were excellent at illustrating the points that Csanyl was trying to make and could resonate with any person who has had experience with dogs at some point in their lifetime.
If you aren't a dog person there is still a lot of interesting information in this book about humans and other animals (including but not limited to primates, wolves and elephants).
A lot of anecdotes and not that much science behind them. In my opinion the author goes too far in interpreting dog behaviour and anthropomorphising. E.g. by saying that a dog settles when its "master" is not around he clearly shows a lack of knowledge on many different breeds. Surely not all dogs settle. You should not claim that something is true unless you have scientific data to confirm it (as long as you want to maintain you're a scientist). Very very fuzzy in scientific terms.
A great in-depth view of what is (probably) going on in a dogs mind. Written by the well known Hungarian Ethologist Vilmos Csanyi, the book was very well respected in Hungary before being translated into English. Csanyi takes a continued look at how dogs think based on prior research of wolves and dog behavior as well as his own research as a Professor at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Well worth the read.
This book had some good parts. There are some chapters that are worth reading and some that contain information more of a scientific nature which wasn't quite was I was looking for.