Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Loss of Java: The Final Battles for the Possession of Java Fought by Allied Air, Naval and Land Forces in the Period of 18 February – 7 March 1942

Rate this book
The Loss of Java explains in detail the air, sea and land battles between the Allied and Japanese armed forces during the battle for Java that followed the evacuation of southern Sumatra in February 1942. Little has been written about the Allied air campaign, or about why Dutch forces fought just one major land battle with the Japanese, the Battle of the Tjiater Pass, in the later stages of the struggle.

P.C. Boer considers whether the assessment of Major General Van Oyen that deploying the Allied air forces might prevent Japanese invasion of Java was realistic, and whether reliance on air power limited the capacity of land and naval forces to repel Japan's advances. The generally accepted idea is that the Allies were ineffective in their fight against the Japanese invaders but in fact the Japanese suffered serious losses. Boer's study shows that Dutch strategy grew out of a carefully-devised plan of defense, and that the battle for Java comprised not one (the Battle of the Java Sea) but four major engagements. However, Japanese commanders at various levels consciously took steps that exposed their forces to great risk but succeeded in putting the Allies under great pressure. In the end the Royal Netherlands East Indies Army (KNIL) and the Allied forces capitulated on 8 March 1942.

This book is a translation of Het verlies van Java: een kwestie van Air Power; de eindstrijd om Nederlands-Indië van de geallieerde lucht-, zee- en landstrijdkrachten in de periode van 18 februari t/m 7 maart 1942 (Bataafsche Leeuw BV for the Koninklijke Militaire Academie, 2006).

640 pages, Paperback

First published May 18, 2006

14 people want to read

About the author

P.C. Boer

10 books2 followers
Dr. P.C. (Peter) Boer ontwikkelde een interesse voor de geschiedenis van de Nederlandse strijdkrachten en met name de luchtstrijdkrachten tijdens zijn middelbare schooltijd in Hilversum. Diverse Indië veteranen woonden in de buurt en in de late jaren 60 begon hij met het interviewen van veteranen, was een enthousiast vliegtuigspotter en schreef zijn eerste stukjes voor het jeugdblad Arend en het militair historische tijdschrift Mars et Historia. Vanaf 1969 en tot 1 november 2010 was hij afwisselend werkzaam bij de Koninklijke Luchtmacht en het ministerie van Defensie en vervolgens bij de Faculteit van de Koninklijke Militaire Academie (later Nederlandse Defensie Academie), in functies uiteenlopend van helikoptervlieger tot vakgroep voorzitter. Intussen studeerde hij in de avonduren Economie, studeerde in 1983 af aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam en promoveerde daar in 1987 op een militair-historisch onderwerp. Hij is auteur van diverse boeken en een groot aantal artikelen over onder andere 'human factors' en veiligheid en op militair-historisch gebied. Hij schrijft de laatste jaren vooral over de geschiedenis van de Militaire Luchtvaart van het KNIL.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (16%)
4 stars
3 (50%)
3 stars
1 (16%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (16%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
7 reviews
June 7, 2023
Interesting perspective on the loss of Java to the Japanese.

I felt it was a little too partisan towards the allies however. There is no doubt that had the allied plan unfolded with a little more luck they could possibly have held on until Blackforce and other allied formations joined the fight and there is also no doubt that the Japanese took some remarkable risks with what few ground forces there were BUT Boer is remarkably uncritical of the dissolute commands structure, lack of aggressive action and appalling marshalling of forces that the KNIL undertook.
Profile Image for Samuel.
25 reviews2 followers
January 3, 2020
The hidden gems of history of one’s own home is always interesting to be dug up. Military history might not be everyone’s cup of Joe, so due caution.
The language is a bit repetitive on some areas though, just to reinforce a notion.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.