Applied Combinatorics

by Alan Tucker

The new 6 th edition of Applied Combinatorics builds on the previous editions with more in depth analysis of computer systems in order to help develop proficiency in basic discrete math problem solving. As one of the most widely used book in combinatorial problems, this edition explains how to reason and model combinatorically while stressing the systematic analysis of different possibilities, exploration of the logical structure of a problem, and ingenuity. Although important uses of combinatorics in computer science, operations research, and finite probability are mentioned, these applications are often used solely for motivation. Numerical examples involving the same concepts use more interesting settings such as poker probabilities or logical games. This book is designed for use by students with a wide range of ability and maturity (sophomores through beginning graduate students). The stronger the students, the harder the exercises that can be assigned. The book can be used for one-quarter, two-quarter, or one-semester course depending on how much material is used.

Genres: Mathematics, Nonfiction, Textbooks, Reference, Technical

496 pages, Hardcover

First published December 31, 1978

About the author

Librarian Note: There is more than one author in the GoodReads database with this name.

Reviews

[Mark Richman · Rating 3 out of 5]

Alan Tucker was my professor in college. Combinatorics and Graph Theory were my absolute favorite subjects.

[Joe · Rating 4 out of 5]

The maths high key slays, bought like 2 years ago but haven't finished it

[Steve · Rating 4 out of 5]

This was just an okay textbook. There are sections of this book that are very well written (when you get into the actual start of the Combinatorics section, the author does a fantastic job of introducing the subject, provides a LOT of examples, and really does a great job of explaining what is a tough subject to many people.

But there are sections that are just terribly done. The section on non-homogeous recurrence relations was very vague, and the examples were a bit poor. The early sections covering edge and vertex covers also weren't very well explained (especially given that easier solutions using logic formulas exist).

So, overall, not a terrible book, but it could definitely use some improvement.

[Mark · Rating 2 out of 5]

Good problems, but bad explanations.

[Sina]

math