If Memory Serves: Gay Men, AIDS, and the Promise of the Queer Past

by Christopher Castiglia, Christopher Reed

The AIDS epidemic soured the memory of the sexual revolution and gay liberation of the 1970s, and prominent politicians, commentators, and academics instructed gay men to forget the sexual cultures of the 1970s in order to ensure a healthy future. But without memory there can be no future, argue Christopher Castiglia and Christopher Reed in this exploration of the struggle over gay memory that marked the decades following the onset of AIDS. Challenging many of the assumptions behind first-wave queer theory, If Memory Serves offers a new perspective on the emergence of contemporary queer culture from the suppression and repression of gay memory. Drawing on a rich archive of videos, films, television shows, novels, monuments, paintings, and sculptures created in the wake of the epidemic, the authors reveal a resistance among critics to valuing—even recognizing—the inscription of gay memory in art, literature, popular culture, and the built environment. Castiglia and Reed explore such topics as the unacknowledged ways in which the popular sitcom Will and Grace circulated gay subcultural references to awaken a desire for belonging among young viewers; the post-traumatic (un)rememberings of queer theory; and the generation of “ideality politics” in the art of Félix González-Torres, the film Chuck & Buck , and the independent video Video Remains.

Inspired by Alasdair MacIntyre’s insight that “the possession of a historical identity and the possession of a social identity coincide,” Castiglia and Reed demonstrate that memory is crafted in response to inadequacies in the present—and therefore a constructive relation to the past is essential to the imagining of a new future.

Genres: Queer, LGBT, Nonfiction, Gender and Sexuality

259 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 2011

Reviews

[Kel · Rating 5 out of 5]

Overall I really like this book and the way it deals with memorialization. There are a few things I don't agree with but nothing I find objectionable except that in their ENTIRE chapter on Will & Grace they never once speak to Karen's queerness. Even if this is a book that focuses on gay men, you could at least have a paragraph or a line...

[6655321 · Rating 4 out of 5]

inconsistent between being good and being (frankly) a stretch [positive queer reading of Will & Grace], but given how little that is interesting is produced under the auspices of academic queer theory (esp. future positive/sex positive rather than negative queer stuff) its probably worth a read if you do academic queer work and want a counterpoint that isn't Jose Esteban Munoz (by which i mean a straw man)

[Matthew Lawrence · Rating 3 out of 5]

Picked this up a couple of weeks ago for a long bus ride but only just got around to finishing it. Some interesting ideas about gay men/AIDS/collective memory, although some of the pop cultural readings seem kind of nuts. (The reading of Will and Grace as a positive, subversive work and particularly the focus on Jack as a gay ideal is something I'm still trying to wrap my head around.