Dharmasutras are the four surviving works of the ancient Indian expert tradition on the subject of dharma, or the rules of behaviour a community recognizes as binding on its members.
Written in a pithy and aphoristic style and representing the culmination of a long tradition of scholarship, the Dharmasutras record intense disputes and divergent views on such subjects as the education of the young and their rites of passage, ritual procedures and religious ceremonies, marriage and marital rights and obligations, dietary restrictions, the right professions for and the proper interaction between different social groups, sins and their expiations, institutions for the pursuit of holiness, king and the administration of justice, crimes and punishments, death and ancestral rites. In short, these unique documents give us a glimpse of how people, especially Brahmin males, were ideally expected to live their lives within an ordered and hierarchically arranged society.
In this first English translation of the Dharmasutras for over a century, Patrick Olivelle uses the same lucid and elegant style as in his award-winning translation of the Upanisads and incorporates the most recent scholarship on ancient Indian law, society, and religion. Complex material is helpfully organized, making this the ideal edition for the non-specialist as well as for students of Indian society and religion.
About the Series: For over 100 years Oxford World's Classics has made available the broadest spectrum of literature from around the globe. Each affordable volume reflects Oxford's commitment to scholarship, providing the most accurate text plus a wealth of other valuable features, including expert introductions by leading authorities, voluminous notes to clarify the text, up-to-date bibliographies for further study, and much more.
Sometimes just hierarchical, other times criminalistic and cruel, but always severely unjust - the four extant Dharmasutras are painful and entertaining to the modern reader. Who ever thought that a woman was always pure but at the same time bled every month because she shared sin with Indra? Vasishta thought. These sutras which began as portions of larger texts called Kalpa Sutras themselves appendices to the vedic canon by their latter phase came to occupy a larger space in the Brahminical imagination. Patrick Olivelle has done great services in translating them, thereby drawing away the unfair attention that Manu receives. After all, Manu owes much to these texts.
Patrick Olivelle's translation is really good, and his introduction also contextualises the texts properly. However, reading the texts themselves is difficult, especially if you are a non-Brahmin. The Dharmasutra texts were written by Brahmins keeping other Brahmins in mind. Therefore, majority of the rules, laws, injunctions are meant for Brahmins. Other groups are mentioned only when a rule has varna-specific modifications such as punishment for a particular crime.
All the Dharmasutra texts endorse varna system. Brahmin is favoured in all situations. The texts show immense contempt towards Shudras, Chandalas and women. They are not allowed to study Vedas or set up sacred fires, the two things that are most important to a Brahmin man, which also defined his social world.
The texts are concerned with intermixing of varnas. Therefore, they spend considerable time in controlling the sexuality of Brahmin women and non-Brahmin, especially Shudra, men. The texts prescribe really harsh punishments for Shudra men who sleep with upper caste women. It doesn't matter if the sexual intercourse was consensual. The punishment for hearing, reciting or remembering Vedas for a Shudra is similarly very stringent.
The Dharmashastra texts are the bedrock of Brahmanic ideology. They were writen after the Vedas and before the Puranas. Therefore, they had considerable infleunce on the Hinduism that developed in the following two millennia.
I'm giving 5 stars for the stellar translation, introduction, and historiography by Dr. Olivelle.
I'd give 0 stars to the sūtras themselves. These are some of the most ridiculous texts I've read. While not every decree is terrible, the anti-Shudra, anti-Dalit, and anti-women ideology in the text is far too easily accepted by the authors. It's additionally a miracle the Vedas were read at all given that the appearance of a rainbow (11.31) is grounds for not being allowed to recite them according to Apastambha, much less the mere presence of a Dalit.