What do you think?
Rate this book
Imaginary Bodies
Moira Gatens investigates the ways in which differently sexed bodies can occupy the same social or political space. Representations of sexual difference have unacknowledged philosophical roots which cannot be dismissed as a superficial bias on the part of the philosopher, nor removed without destroying the coherence of the philosophical system concerned. The deep structural bias against women extends beyond metaphysics and its effects are felt in epistemology, moral, social and political theory.
The idea of sexual difference is contextualised in Imaginary Bodies and traced through the history of philosophy. Using her work on Spinoza, Gatens develops alternative conceptions of power, new ways of conceiving women's embodiment and their legal, political and ethical status.
The idea of sexual difference is contextualised in Imaginary Bodies and traced through the history of philosophy. Using her work on Spinoza, Gatens develops alternative conceptions of power, new ways of conceiving women's embodiment and their legal, political and ethical status.
182 pages, Paperback
First published November 23, 1995
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
February 5, 2023
Can existence be kept separate from essence?
In the philosophy of creation, making the distinction of essence and existence in things that have been created means the analysis of matter. The quality of the singular, which exists in an operant way, consists of both essence and existence. The separation of essence and existence, on the other hand, becomes clear when we consider the divisible nature of images. Since God is also a being who can think in an imaginary sense, we are talking about an "intellect" that becomes infinite.
The next question is, how is "mind" formed?
The thinking practice of the mind is based on images and concepts. These two ways form the basis of the mind. Both when the mind is creating images and concepts, and images and concepts bring out the mind. This is an infinity loop.
It can be easily stated that there is a deep-rooted context between the Decoupling of images, concepts and terms into existence and essence, as well as space and thought. In the light of this ontological system of Spinoza, which I have described, the writer Moira Gatens has made a psychological analysis and criticism of women's and men's bodies both philosophically and through psychoanalysis. Freud criticizes how the inverse correlation between the images attributed to the male body and the images attributed to the female body leaves an impact on the memory of society, how psychoanalysis Deconstructs this unequal space with examples from time to time, but mostly theoretically.
Upon identifying the images of the other and the excluded, that is, the "incompleteness" that Spinoza classified as "other images" in this regard, the images of completeness attributed to a man created by the opposite sex, Gatens addressed this other and presented his criticisms both in a physical and social sense.
The key point of the book was to approach the other person with concepts such as female, male, female, male, and instead of the thoughts created by these approaches, he only accepted as a person and explained the importance of having information about his thoughts and how important it is to eliminate inequality between men and women. It's quite a beautiful work. I wish you a good reading.
In the philosophy of creation, making the distinction of essence and existence in things that have been created means the analysis of matter. The quality of the singular, which exists in an operant way, consists of both essence and existence. The separation of essence and existence, on the other hand, becomes clear when we consider the divisible nature of images. Since God is also a being who can think in an imaginary sense, we are talking about an "intellect" that becomes infinite.
The next question is, how is "mind" formed?
The thinking practice of the mind is based on images and concepts. These two ways form the basis of the mind. Both when the mind is creating images and concepts, and images and concepts bring out the mind. This is an infinity loop.
It can be easily stated that there is a deep-rooted context between the Decoupling of images, concepts and terms into existence and essence, as well as space and thought. In the light of this ontological system of Spinoza, which I have described, the writer Moira Gatens has made a psychological analysis and criticism of women's and men's bodies both philosophically and through psychoanalysis. Freud criticizes how the inverse correlation between the images attributed to the male body and the images attributed to the female body leaves an impact on the memory of society, how psychoanalysis Deconstructs this unequal space with examples from time to time, but mostly theoretically.
Upon identifying the images of the other and the excluded, that is, the "incompleteness" that Spinoza classified as "other images" in this regard, the images of completeness attributed to a man created by the opposite sex, Gatens addressed this other and presented his criticisms both in a physical and social sense.
The key point of the book was to approach the other person with concepts such as female, male, female, male, and instead of the thoughts created by these approaches, he only accepted as a person and explained the importance of having information about his thoughts and how important it is to eliminate inequality between men and women. It's quite a beautiful work. I wish you a good reading.
August 6, 2007
top notch feminist philosophy, not an ounce of overzealously extolling feminine values in detriment of male-related axiological standards!
June 27, 2026
In Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality, Moira Gatens presents a profound rethinking of embodiment by exploring the psychoanalytic and philosophical notion of the “imaginary body.” Gatens argues that the imaginary body is not a mere subjective fantasy or an illusion; rather, it is a crucial psychical image of the body that is necessary for human movement, action, and intentional subjectivity. According to the text, these imaginary bodies are socially and culturally constructed, functioning as deeply meaningful images and symbols that dictate how different bodies are perceived and experienced in society. By centering this concept, Gatens shifts the focus from a purely anatomical or biological understanding of human bodies to an analysis that recognizes how social environments, language, and culture actively shape our embodied lived experiences.
The core argument of the book is a sustained critique of the Cartesian mind/body dualism that has long dominated Western philosophy. Gatens draws heavily on Spinozist monism to argue that mind and body cannot be neatly separated, asserting instead that they are intertwined networks of capacities and affects. Through this theoretical lens, she demonstrates how Western philosophical and political traditions have historically produced configurations where masculinity is intrinsically linked to reason, power, and dominance, while femininity is associated with nature, passivity, and the physical body. Gatens systematically unpacks how these socially dominant imaginaries become entrenched in political and ethical institutions, thereby naturalizing the subjugation of women and validating male-centric models of the “universal” human subject.
In terms of its contribution to feminist theory, Imaginary Bodies fundamentally complicates the traditional feminist distinction between sex (viewed as a biological given) and gender (viewed as a social construct). Gatens argues that to truly understand the dynamics of sex and gender, one must undertake a rigorous analysis of the imaginary body itself. She posits that bodies are never purely biological “blank slates” waiting to be inscribed by societal gender roles; they are always already “sexed” and interpreted through the lens of historical and cultural imaginaries. Consequently, Gatens advocates for a new ethical and political framework that acknowledges corporeal difference without reducing it to biological determinism. This requires constructing new social imaginaries that validate female embodiment in its own right, rather than defining it merely as a “lack” or deviation from the male norm.
Despite its significant theoretical contributions, Gatens’ framework has faced various criticisms within feminist and philosophical circles. Some critics point out that while her reliance on Spinozist monism successfully bypasses the pitfalls of Cartesian dualism, it occasionally reaches a level of philosophical abstraction that risks minimizing the intersectional, material realities of diverse women—such as how race, class, and colonial histories intersect with these “imaginary bodies.” Furthermore, debates frequently arise regarding the tension between the overwhelming power of collective “social imaginaries” and the capacity for individual agency. If our bodily boundaries, desires, and intentional subjectivities are so profoundly structured by historical and cultural representations, critics question how effectively individual subjects can resist, subvert, or completely redefine these deeply ingrained images. Nevertheless, the book remains a foundational text for understanding the complex intersections of corporeality, culture, and power.
The core argument of the book is a sustained critique of the Cartesian mind/body dualism that has long dominated Western philosophy. Gatens draws heavily on Spinozist monism to argue that mind and body cannot be neatly separated, asserting instead that they are intertwined networks of capacities and affects. Through this theoretical lens, she demonstrates how Western philosophical and political traditions have historically produced configurations where masculinity is intrinsically linked to reason, power, and dominance, while femininity is associated with nature, passivity, and the physical body. Gatens systematically unpacks how these socially dominant imaginaries become entrenched in political and ethical institutions, thereby naturalizing the subjugation of women and validating male-centric models of the “universal” human subject.
In terms of its contribution to feminist theory, Imaginary Bodies fundamentally complicates the traditional feminist distinction between sex (viewed as a biological given) and gender (viewed as a social construct). Gatens argues that to truly understand the dynamics of sex and gender, one must undertake a rigorous analysis of the imaginary body itself. She posits that bodies are never purely biological “blank slates” waiting to be inscribed by societal gender roles; they are always already “sexed” and interpreted through the lens of historical and cultural imaginaries. Consequently, Gatens advocates for a new ethical and political framework that acknowledges corporeal difference without reducing it to biological determinism. This requires constructing new social imaginaries that validate female embodiment in its own right, rather than defining it merely as a “lack” or deviation from the male norm.
Despite its significant theoretical contributions, Gatens’ framework has faced various criticisms within feminist and philosophical circles. Some critics point out that while her reliance on Spinozist monism successfully bypasses the pitfalls of Cartesian dualism, it occasionally reaches a level of philosophical abstraction that risks minimizing the intersectional, material realities of diverse women—such as how race, class, and colonial histories intersect with these “imaginary bodies.” Furthermore, debates frequently arise regarding the tension between the overwhelming power of collective “social imaginaries” and the capacity for individual agency. If our bodily boundaries, desires, and intentional subjectivities are so profoundly structured by historical and cultural representations, critics question how effectively individual subjects can resist, subvert, or completely redefine these deeply ingrained images. Nevertheless, the book remains a foundational text for understanding the complex intersections of corporeality, culture, and power.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews