Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Jack the Ripper: His Life and Crimes in Popular Entertainment

Rate this book
The identity of Jack the Ripper has consumed public curiosity since he first tormented the East End of London in 1888. Numerous theories have been offered as to the Ripper's identity, but a definitive answer has always been elusive. He remains in the shadows where, it seems, only imaginative literature has been able to elucidate his meaning to the modern world. This work surveys the literary, film, television, and radio treatments of Jack the Ripper and his crimes. The works of fiction are thoroughly analyzed, as are the major nonfiction works that have offered various theories about the Ripper's identity. Works whose narratives are obviously inspired by Jack the Ripper and his crimes are also discussed. Many of the works reviewed herein became available only after extensive searches of television and radio logs, studio release schedules, newspaper and magazine reviews, and numerous bibliographies.

Hardcover

First published July 1, 1999

1 person is currently reading
8 people want to read

About the author

Gary Coville

3 books7 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
0 (0%)
4 stars
0 (0%)
3 stars
5 (100%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
Profile Image for Joshua.
18 reviews12 followers
Read
June 5, 2021
Originally, I gave this two stars, but I had to downgrade it to just one. The more I think about this book, the more annoyed I am. What should have been an annotated bibliography of media on Jack the Ripper—and the appendix at the end of the book serves this very function—was instead stretched out by the authors for roughly 160 pages. Their thesis is obvious and simplistic, their chapter divisions are arbitrary, their examples and interpretations are repetitive, and their "apolitical" approach is really just thinly veiled liberal-bashing. They also have disinterest, if not all-out contempt, for academic approaches to popular cultural studies, which is odd for an analysis of literature, radio, film and television. Rather than producing a detailed and nuanced study, the authors instead bludgeoned a topic into submission. What a disappointment.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.