What do you think?
Rate this book
438 pages, Paperback
First published April 25, 2003
According to liberation theology, progress for the poor is not likely to ensue from development approaches which are based on a "liberal" view of poverty. Liberal views place the problem with the poor themselves: these people are backward and reject the technological fruits of modernity.And what of the liberals then? I doubt they would agree with this assessment. Similarly, his discussion of the inherent weaknesses of for-profit healthcare (which I am sympathetic to) is full of very, very bad economics, and derision for "profit" without even defining terms. What is profit here? Accounting profit or economic profit? If economic, a Marxist profit or a neoclassical one? If one holds to the labor theory of value, sure, I can see the issue, but if one does not?