What do you think?
Rate this book
Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Husserl and the Cartesian Meditations
Husserl is one of the most important philosophers of the twentieth century and his contribution to the phenomenology movement is widely recognised. The Cartesian Meditations is his most famous, and most widely studied work. The book introduces and Husserl's life and background to the Cartesian Meditations , the ideas and text of the Cartesian Meditations and the continuing imporance of Husserl's work to Philosophy.
- GenresPhilosophyNonfiction
292 pages, Paperback
First published March 13, 2003
6 people are currently reading
64 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
August 2, 2023
if you like this review, i now have website: www.michaelkamakana.com
211030: another reread on husserl. did not write review first time. this almost inspires me to try Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology again, though i think hs's 'ideas 1, 2' are more likely. as it has been years since read, do not know how much is by memory, how much new, but this guidebook certainly elucidates that text. which is, as noted, far from accessible introduction, too compressed, dependent on knowing some of hs other work...
in reviewing this text i will cover meditations in each chapter, as smith does, after brief intro on 'idea' of philosophy, which for hs was the discovery of 'transcendental phenomenology', the only true way, which he contrasted with descartes attempt to 'prove' the existence of the world from his ideas. hs insists there are only ideas....
starting with ch 1, meditation 1, hs describes the 'epoche' (bracketing of all other knowledge than immediate sense of 'things themselves') and resulting 'phenomenological reduction' (things themselves), this is followed by constitution of objects, by relationship to psychology (which is close but also tends to make objects rather than how), then evidenz, intuition, 'the cartesian way'...
ch 2, med 2, hs describes 'intentionality' (that thought is always 'directed' or '-of' something), and necessary concept of horizon (limit of sense interior, exterior), contrast with 'sensualism' and 'sense-datum' both of which have atomistic effecting elements rather than original sense, important section on 'time', and thus genesis of thought experience, and 'hyle', sensory data of all sorts, then 'intentional analysis', which must be guided by those things themselves...
ch3, med 4, mostly. ego, person, monad, hs describes null point of thought, of how ego is clothed in person, is in infinite number of monads with windows (contrast with leibniz), then 'static' and 'genetic' phenomenology, active and passive synthesis (active is genesis based on 'pre-given' sense), then 'eidetic phenomenology and the nature of thought' (eidetic is 'essential', nature of thought is always 'intuition/categorical'), then 'founding', of which cognition is itself mot important, then transcendental instincts and 'drive-intentionality' eg. universal drive of baby to breast...
ch4, med 3, part of 4. hs deals with solipsism in reality and reason, then world, then 'idea' of reality (reality is indefinitely confirmed or not), then reality and objectivity (there is one world), then hs's idealism, which is best seen in 'strong' version. there is great 'proof' of idealism (not hs, he never 'argued' much), which smith offers, in footnotes mentioning his reading is not uncontroversial... then on theoretical science and hs's idea of 'life-world', then hs's metaphysics...
ch5, med 5. hs describes sphere of ownness, empathy, then body. can certainly see how fascinated and inspired was merleau-ponty by this section. hs is concerned not with then 'problem of other minds' but the intersubjectivity he saw necessary to 'community' of monads, not all 'awake', let alone human, so decided on 'pairing-reverse-pairing'. smith addresses more controversies, complaints, that hs is just assuming things but insists this is too shallow reading, that there is yet more of hs to be read...
conclusion: having read this twice, i have decided to up the rating, primarily because it inspires me to read him again. but there are so many books, so little time... (repeat: there are so many books to read and so little time...)
020220: more
Edmund Husserl: Philosopher of Infinite Tasks
Husserl's Phenomenology
Husserl
Edmund Husserl: Founder of Phenomenology
Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology
211030: another reread on husserl. did not write review first time. this almost inspires me to try Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology again, though i think hs's 'ideas 1, 2' are more likely. as it has been years since read, do not know how much is by memory, how much new, but this guidebook certainly elucidates that text. which is, as noted, far from accessible introduction, too compressed, dependent on knowing some of hs other work...
in reviewing this text i will cover meditations in each chapter, as smith does, after brief intro on 'idea' of philosophy, which for hs was the discovery of 'transcendental phenomenology', the only true way, which he contrasted with descartes attempt to 'prove' the existence of the world from his ideas. hs insists there are only ideas....
starting with ch 1, meditation 1, hs describes the 'epoche' (bracketing of all other knowledge than immediate sense of 'things themselves') and resulting 'phenomenological reduction' (things themselves), this is followed by constitution of objects, by relationship to psychology (which is close but also tends to make objects rather than how), then evidenz, intuition, 'the cartesian way'...
ch 2, med 2, hs describes 'intentionality' (that thought is always 'directed' or '-of' something), and necessary concept of horizon (limit of sense interior, exterior), contrast with 'sensualism' and 'sense-datum' both of which have atomistic effecting elements rather than original sense, important section on 'time', and thus genesis of thought experience, and 'hyle', sensory data of all sorts, then 'intentional analysis', which must be guided by those things themselves...
ch3, med 4, mostly. ego, person, monad, hs describes null point of thought, of how ego is clothed in person, is in infinite number of monads with windows (contrast with leibniz), then 'static' and 'genetic' phenomenology, active and passive synthesis (active is genesis based on 'pre-given' sense), then 'eidetic phenomenology and the nature of thought' (eidetic is 'essential', nature of thought is always 'intuition/categorical'), then 'founding', of which cognition is itself mot important, then transcendental instincts and 'drive-intentionality' eg. universal drive of baby to breast...
ch4, med 3, part of 4. hs deals with solipsism in reality and reason, then world, then 'idea' of reality (reality is indefinitely confirmed or not), then reality and objectivity (there is one world), then hs's idealism, which is best seen in 'strong' version. there is great 'proof' of idealism (not hs, he never 'argued' much), which smith offers, in footnotes mentioning his reading is not uncontroversial... then on theoretical science and hs's idea of 'life-world', then hs's metaphysics...
ch5, med 5. hs describes sphere of ownness, empathy, then body. can certainly see how fascinated and inspired was merleau-ponty by this section. hs is concerned not with then 'problem of other minds' but the intersubjectivity he saw necessary to 'community' of monads, not all 'awake', let alone human, so decided on 'pairing-reverse-pairing'. smith addresses more controversies, complaints, that hs is just assuming things but insists this is too shallow reading, that there is yet more of hs to be read...
conclusion: having read this twice, i have decided to up the rating, primarily because it inspires me to read him again. but there are so many books, so little time... (repeat: there are so many books to read and so little time...)
020220: more
Edmund Husserl: Philosopher of Infinite Tasks
Husserl's Phenomenology
Husserl
Edmund Husserl: Founder of Phenomenology
Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology
October 22, 2017
It's too brave not to elucidate the basic problems of phenomenology by refraining some discussions that should form a background, and not even to delve into mentioning some problematic issues in CM other than a couple of exceptional passages.
April 13, 2020
Husserl and the Cartesian Meditations by A. D. Smith
This is a very good work. Its focus is on explaining Husserl’s phenomenology (study of the mind) which is not at all easy to understand. It is in the Routledge Philosophy Guidebook series, but it is more than a guidebook. Although its specific task is to help readers understand Husserl’s Cartesian Meditations, it goes much further by drawing on many of Husserl’s earlier works in order to explain difficult concepts that are central to his philosophy.
The chapters roughly correlate to Husserl’s five meditations. I read each of Smith’s chapters after reading each of Husserl’s up to the fourth meditation at which point I reversed the order – Smith and then Husserl! It didn’t seem to make much difference.
This is a very good work. Its focus is on explaining Husserl’s phenomenology (study of the mind) which is not at all easy to understand. It is in the Routledge Philosophy Guidebook series, but it is more than a guidebook. Although its specific task is to help readers understand Husserl’s Cartesian Meditations, it goes much further by drawing on many of Husserl’s earlier works in order to explain difficult concepts that are central to his philosophy.
The chapters roughly correlate to Husserl’s five meditations. I read each of Smith’s chapters after reading each of Husserl’s up to the fourth meditation at which point I reversed the order – Smith and then Husserl! It didn’t seem to make much difference.
February 16, 2025
nice little introduction to husserl, in full systematic context. it's sometimes very good to read a sympathetic treatment of something of which you are wholly unsympathetic, but not always very pleasurable
October 9, 2016
An essential guide to read Husserl's Cartesian Meditations at an undergraduate level. Unfortunately, Smith alternates clarity and simplicity to moments of great erraticisms and impenetrability which rival with the source material he tries to explain and clarify. That he presume, instead of explaining, a considerable amount of Husserlian and phenomenological background does not help.
Read
September 4, 2025Honestly I wouldn’t have ranked it so high other than the fact that I find it genuinely impressive that he managed to make any of Husserl coherent
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews