How do meaningless marks and sounds become the meaningful words of a natural language? To what do words having referential significance refer? What is the meaning of the words that do not have referential significance? Can ordinary language really do what it appears to do, or is this an illusion? Dr. Adler maintains that these fundamental questions are not satisfactorily treated in the two main philosophies of language that have dominated twentieth-century thinking on the subject - the syntactical and 'ordinary language' approaches.
Drawing upon the tradition of Aristotle, Aquinas, Poinsot, and Husserl, Dr. Adler's own discussion exemplifies the third approach, which he describes as "semantic and lexical." In this now -classic work, the fruit of more than 50 years' concern with the philosophy of language, Dr. Adler advances a powerful theory of meaning and applies it to some outstanding philosophical problems. In unpretentious and uncluttered prose, he provides a limpid introduction to a number of knotty philosophical issues and at the same time issues a challenge to some of the most tenacious doctrines of the modern world.
This popular author worked with thought of Aristotle and Saint Thomas Aquinas. He lived for the longest stretches in cities of New York, Chicago, San Francisco, and San Mateo. He worked for Columbia University, the University of Chicago, Encyclopædia Britannica, and own institute for philosophical research.
Born to Jewish immigrants, he dropped out school at 14 years of age in 1917 to a copy boy for the New York Sun with the ultimate aspiration to a journalist. Adler quickly returned to school to take writing classes at night and discovered the works of Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and other men, whom he came to call heroes. He went to study at Columbia University and contributed to the student literary magazine, The Morningside, (a poem "Choice" in 1922 when Charles A. Wagner was editor-in-chief and Whittaker Chambers an associate editor). Though he failed to pass the required swimming test for a bachelor's degree (a matter that was rectified when Columbia gave him an honorary degree in 1983), he stayed at the university and eventually received an instructorship and finally a doctorate in psychology. While at Columbia University, Adler wrote his first book: Dialectic, published in 1927.
In 1930 Robert Hutchins, the newly appointed president of the University of Chicago, whom Adler had befriended some years earlier, arranged for Chicago’s law school to hire him as a professor of the philosophy of law; the philosophers at Chicago (who included James H. Tufts, E.A. Burtt, and George H. Mead) had "entertained grave doubts as to Mr. Adler's competence in the field [of philosophy]" and resisted Adler's appointment to the University's Department of Philosophy. Adler was the first "non-lawyer" to join the law school faculty. Adler also taught philosophy to business executives at the Aspen Institute.
Adler and Hutchins went on to found the Great Books of the Western World program and the Great Books Foundation. Adler founded and served as director of the Institute for Philosophical Research in 1952. He also served on the Board of Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica since its inception in 1949, and succeeded Hutchins as its chairman from 1974. As the director of editorial planning for the fifteenth edition of Britannica from 1965, he was instrumental in the major reorganization of knowledge embodied in that edition. He introduced the Paideia Proposal which resulted in his founding the Paideia Program, a grade-school curriculum centered around guided reading and discussion of difficult works (as judged for each grade). With Max Weismann, he founded The Center for the Study of The Great Ideas.
Adler long strove to bring philosophy to the masses, and some of his works (such as How to Read a Book) became popular bestsellers. He was also an advocate of economic democracy and wrote an influential preface to Louis Kelso's The Capitalist Manifesto. Adler was often aided in his thinking and writing by Arthur Rubin, an old friend from his Columbia undergraduate days. In his own words:
Unlike many of my contemporaries, I never write books for my fellow professors to read. I have no interest in the academic audience at all. I'm interested in Joe Doakes. A general audience can read any book I write—and they do.
This book wasn't exactly what I expected--I thought it would be more about linguistics when it is really a philosophy of language. It's certainly not for the casual reader. I would even venture to say it's above the head of the "interested non-professional." I'm not going to pretend I fully absorbed the content of this book, but it was certainly interesting in the parts I did understand. I don't have quite enough background in philosophies of language to know other viewpoints on the topic but Adler seems to do a good job of addressing and shooting down the opposition. I don't know that I'd recommend this book for leisure reading, but as far as the topic is concerned it wasn't bad.
I'm actually re-reading this book. It has been 20 years since my first reading. Excellent read for anyone interested in the formation of language. As always, Adler's writing is the ultimate in technical perfection. Not recommended unless you are REALLY into the science of language.
Many exciting insights that are implicit in other works by Adler and other modern philosophers are fully explained here: Awareness and attention. Modes of existence. When does apprehension take place. Role of concepts in communication.
One of the best and most useful philosophy books I have read.
This book put for me in a much clearer perspective not only what goes on with language and the meaning of words but also what that might imply about what the mind is and what reality is and how we talk objectively about things that are real as well as things that are imagined. Whether you agree with all of his theory about language or not, he provides a rich vocabulary for discussing the philosophy of language. I will be keeping his theory in mind as I continue reading Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding and Kant's writings. Although it is not the subject of the book Mr. Adler also provides a rich framework for thinking about logic, especially with regard to existential import, existential presupposition, and existential implication that will help me in my study of logic. The epilogue, however, is polemical and I think that that his harsh judgment of modern philosophy is not necessary. I would rather think that Mr. Adler's excellent thinking can be critically used in the study of modern philosophy. The twists and turns that the history of philosophy from Descartes onward have taken are avenues that had to be explored and even along with unproductive theories and views, it contains gems still worth pursuing. The key is that we have to keep thinking and looking back at turns that were made and questioning them. Mr Adler's book will certainly help in that regard.