Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research

by Jerome Kirk, Marc L. Miller

Kirk and Miller define what is -- and what is not -- qualitative research. They suggest that the use of numbers in the process of recording and analyzing observations is less important than that the research should involve sustained interaction with the people being studied, in their own language and on their own turf. Following a chapter on objectivity, the authors discuss the role of reliability and validity and the problems that arise when these issues are neglected. They present a paradigm for the qualitative research process that makes it possible to pursue validity without neglecting reliability.

88 pages, Paperback

First published December 1, 1985

Reviews

[Dr. Chad Newton, PhD-HRD · Rating 4 out of 5]

Major Points:

!) Main argument- the qualitative problem of validity can be handled by field research, and the similar problem of reliability can be handled by documented ethnographic decision-making (p. 73).

2) Three types of qualitative reliability -
Quixotic
Diachronic
Synchronic

3) Four phases of qualitative explanation