Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Canadian Cases in the Philosophy of Law

Rate this book
This is a collection of Canadian legal decisions, mostly from the highest court of the land, that raise and respond to central issues in political and legal philosophy and social ethics. All the issues raised by these cases are current and controversial. They the scope of judicial review and legitimate powers of the courts; separation of powers; the nature and scope of rights of speech, association, Aboriginal rights, and legal protections in criminal prosecution; equality and its pursuit in a free and democratic society; autonomy and its protection; the nature of legal responsibility in criminal and tort law; and legitimate punishment. This edition takes into account the many changes that have occurred in our court's interpretation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Twelve new cases have been added, as has a new section on “Group Self-Determination” that takes into account important changes in Aboriginal rights. Many of the cases from the previous edition have been re-edited and slightly expanded, with “follow up” cases included to reflect how they are now interpreted.

330 pages, Paperback

First published February 1, 1992

5 people are currently reading
5 people want to read

About the author

Jerome E. Bickenbach

15 books2 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
0 (0%)
4 stars
6 (100%)
3 stars
0 (0%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Daniel Silveyra.
101 reviews3 followers
January 22, 2019
If you're interested in law or how court decisions on landmark cases are made, it's a great read. Otherwise, it's a little dry and you may get a better overview of the judicial process on interesting cases elsewhere.

Selection of court rulings on important Canadian cases regarding human rights, constitutional law, civil liberties, discrimination, etc. Each case is given a succinct summary and then it's straight onto excerpted rulings from the justices.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.