Jump to ratings and reviews

Theories On The Scrap Heap: Scientists and Philosophers on the Falsification, Rejection, and Replacement of Theories

In a recent issue of the Atlantic Monthly , Cullen Murphy wrote that "It is always a little disconcerting when audacious scientific theories come a cropper." In this case, he was speaking of Stephen Hawking's now self-repudiated idea that information swallowed by cosmic black holes might be escaping into "baby universes." John Losee looks at the subject of rejected scientific theories through an analysis of case studies from more than two centuries of science. Losee excerpts the work of prominent scientists and philosophers of science accompanied by evaluative comments from the fields of science and philosophy. He sets these discussions within an analytical framework developed as answers to a sequence of questions about falsification, rejection, and theory When observational evidence conflicts with the assumptions of a theory, does this signify the death of the theory? If rival theories are available to account for an experience, how is the choice between them to be made? Are there generally accepted criteria against which competing theories may be assessed? When is the replacement of one theory by another justified? Each excerpt from each scientist or philosopher is of sufficient length to make clear the particular evaluative problem under consideration, and each discussion of scientific evaluative practice includes both what scientists and what philosophers have written on the topic. At a time when increasingly complex scientific questions must be considered and addressed in a variety of public forums, Theories on the Scrap Heap offers guidance for assessing the underlying assumptions and validity of scientific theory and for understanding how the scientific method works in theories formation and rejection.

206 pages, Paperback

First published April 7, 2005

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

John Losee

18 books5 followers
After many years of teaching at Lafayette College and establishing myself as an author of nine thought-provoking philosophy books. I decided to try my hand at creative writing. I embraced a new role as a storyteller. Inspired by the rhythms of modern life, I set out to craft engaging, humorous short stories that can be devoured in the time it takes to sip a cup of coffee. The Adventures of Max and Maude is my first work of fiction.

In Millwood Stories, I continue to create bite-sized tales that reflect the humor and complexity of life, offering quick escapes into a world where ordinary moments unfold into extraordinary adventures. This format, I believe, resonates with the fast pace of today’s world – perfect for readers seeking an enjoyable and satisfying break.

In The Sabbatical Sleuth, I invite readers to follow the exploits of a professor who joins a detective agency on a leave of absence from his university. He turns out to be rather good at this new job. This collection of short stories is another window into the happenings of Millwood. Readers will be surprised by the turn of events.

With a keen eye for human emotion and a playful sense of adventure, my stories aim to bring a spark of joy to readers from all walks of life.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
3 (37%)
4 stars
1 (12%)
3 stars
4 (50%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Kirsten Tautfest.
150 reviews4 followers
June 24, 2017
This was a bookclub selection for my Freethinkers Book Discussion group. The first chapter bogs you down in logic sentences that the authors assumes the reader remembers from Logic 101, which I've had, but it needed a lay person translation. Very off-putting. The rest of the book seems to lean heavily on long quotations from the original theorists' works that are being parsed. Again, this bogs down the book and it would have been better served in another manner. Overall, the author's intent seems to be to provide tools for evaluating existing and future replacement theories. This it does accomplish, while at the same time between the lines dashing the hopes for a "theory of everything" - the holy grail of philosophers & physicists.
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review