Granted I am reading this book with the advantage of twenty years of hind sight, but this book was just plain poorly put together. To be fair, the author does admit he has an agenda and a bias. Even with that though the book is full of unsupported theories, undefined terms, exclusionary history. He argues that rules should only be followed when they allow one to win. This he seemed to apply to rules of logic as well. It is at least a short read.