Paul's letter to the Romans, says Nanos, is an example of Jewish correspondence, addressing believers in Jesus who are steeped in Jewish ways-whether of Jewish or gentile origin. Arguing against those who think Paul was an apostate from Judaism, Nanos maintains Paul's continuity with his Jewish heritage. Several key arguments here are: Those addressed in Paul's letter were still an integral part of the Roman synagogue communities. The "weak" are non- Christian Jews, while the "strong" included both Jewish and gentile converts to belief in Jesus. Paul as a practicing devout Jew insists on the rules of behavior for "the righteous gentiles." Christian subordination to authorities (Romans 13:1-7) is intended to enforce submission to leaders of the synagogues, not Roman government officials. Paul behaves in a way to confirm the very Jewish portrait of him in Acts: going first to the synagogues.
I can see why this award winning book is being quoted by so many Messianic Jewish authors now. This was quite readable for an academic book. He takes a 1st century view on Romans, as opposed to the standard 2nd century assumptions imposed onto Romans. If you are involved with the teaching ministry, you should read this book.
Trailblazer for its time. Some great insights here with some very floppy exegesis (eisegesis). Nanos does comprehend correctly the Jewishness of the church. Another pivotal point I still remember is the dualistic nature of covetousness not only wanting your neighbour's whatever but also comparing what you have and looking down on them too. Definitely a unique tool for the NPP and Jason Staples to build on top of.
Very reveling on Pauls heart and how much he loved the Jewish bretheren and wanted to see them come to Christ. Lots of details on how the Jewish community behaved and what that culture looked like back then. You can read this straight but it has many many footnotes on every page so you could also take your time for a much deeper understaning.