Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Employment Arena

by Samuel Estreicher (Editor), David Sherwyn (Editor)

On the strength of the landmark 1991 Gilmer decision of the U.S. Supreme Court¿which set a precedent precluding employees from litigation against their employers if they had signed a pre-dispute mandatory arbitration agreement¿many U.S. companies have developed mandatory alternative dispute resolution (ADR) policies for employees. However, the issue is far from settled. A major segment of the U.S. labor and employment law community, including the powerful Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and numerous high-profile academics, contend that such agreements are unenforceable, and indeed should be unenforceable as a matter of policy. This controversy was the theme of New York University¿s 53rd Annual Conference on Labor. This long-standing, influential conference is the premier forum for bringing together legal practitioners, academics and researchers, government officials, representatives of companies and labor unions, and human resources specialists to explore solutions to problems in the American workplace. The Conference has recently been brought under the umbrella of the Center for Labor and Employment Law at the New York University School of Law, chaired by Professor Samuel Estreicher. This valuable symposium addresses such provocative questions as the

1008 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 2004