Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Clear-Cutting Eden: Ecology and the Pastoral in Southern Literature

Rate this book
Examines how Southern literary depictions of the natural world were influenced by the historical, social, and ecological changes of the 1930s and 1940s

 

Rieger studies the ways that nature is conceived of and portrayed by four prominent Southern writers of the Erskine Caldwell, Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings, Zora Neale Hurston, and William Faulkner. Specifically, he argues that these writers created new versions of an old literary mode—the pastoral—in response to the destabilizing effects of the Great Depression, the rise of Southern modernism, and the mechanization of agricultural jobs.

 

Mass deforestation, soil erosion, urban development, and depleted soil fertility are issues that come to the fore in the works of these writers. In response, each author depicts a network model of nature, where humans are part of the natural world, rather than separate, over, or above it, as in the garden pastorals of the Old South, thus significantly revising the pastoral mode proffered by antebellum and Reconstruction-era writers.

 

Each writer, Rieger finds, infuses the pastoral mode with continuing relevance, creating new versions that fit his or her ideological positions on issues of race, class, and gender. Despite the ways these authors represent nature and humankind’s place in it, they all illustrate the idea that the natural environment is more than just a passive background against which the substance of life, or fiction, is played out.

264 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 2009

7 people want to read

About the author

Christopher Rieger

7 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (20%)
4 stars
3 (60%)
3 stars
1 (20%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Katie.
34 reviews
November 23, 2015
It's very solid literary criticism, even if the author chose some choices that were BLATANTLY OBVIOUS (Faulkner and Their Eyes Were Watching God? Really?) However, there are moments where ecocriticism badly slips in (I wanted more!) and Rieger is very hit or miss with regards to putting the books in a real-world context. Solid job with the literary analysis, not so solid job tying it to the bigger picture.
Displaying 1 of 1 review