Perspectives on Spirit Baptism

Perspectives

by Ralph Del Colle, H. Ray Dunning, Larry Hart

Perspectives on Spirit Baptism presents in counterpoint form the basic common beliefs on spirit baptism which have developed over the course of church history with a view toward determining which is most faithful to Scripture. Each chapter will be written by a prominent person from within each tradition—with specific guidelines dealing with the biblical, historical, and theological issues within each tradition. In addition, each writer will have the opportunity to give a brief response to the other traditions.

338 pages, Paperback

First published November 1, 2004

Reviews

[Amanda Tranmer · Rating 4 out of 5]

I most enjoyed the back and forths between Kaiser Jr (Reformed) and Hart (Dimensional Charismatic.) I find a home somewhere in the midst of their particular debates. Hart's arguments, in my opinion, do the most justice to the widest range of Biblical passages in the debate, seeking to incorporate the whole council into a workable theology while allowing the most room for the tensions inherit in doing so. The wishy-washiness (my label) Kaiser Jr. seems to accuse Hart of is the very reason I am drawn to his viewpoint. It can be a strength to admit that our interpretations and understandings of certain doctrines as they relate to various Biblical passages don't fit entirely into perfect molds. Sometimes we just don't know or understand how they all work together. We see in the mirror dimly. Better to admit that than to force certainty.
Incidentally, I also felt that Hart did the best job teaching his perspective. His 3P's chart (Paschal, Purifying, Pentacostal) explaining the dimensions of the Spirit's work might be what sticks with me most out of the whole volume.
The Pentacostal presentation by Horton did not allow for any flexibility, his rigidity and defensiveness are why I enjoyed his essay and perspective least and disagreed with it most. I found the Sacramental perspective given by Del Colle instructive as Charistmatic Catholicism is something I have no previous instruction on. And Dunning's Weslyan view has inspired me to read more Wesley. His essay was as much about what the Weslyan perspective is Not (the other perspectives and movements that sprang out of Welsey's teachings) as it is about what it is (since Wesley focused on Sanctification as the work of the Spirit than on the idea of "Spirit Baptism" persay.)
Overall, it is a very interesting and educational discussion. I especially appreciated the opportunities the 5 men were given to respond to each of the other essays. It helped clarify for me the differences in their viewpoints and points of connection and contention.

[Dave Betts · Rating 3 out of 5]

I've read a few books in the "perspectives" series and this seems the weakest so far. Too much anecdotal commentary and not enough biblical exegesis - not usually a problem for the series. That said, there's still plenty to chew on in here and disagreement is charitable and honouring, which I very much appreciate.

[Nick · Rating 3 out of 5]

The book itself is fine. Obviously I had issues with the positions that I did not agree with, but the writing was clear, concise, and to the point. If you're looking for brief explanations on this doctrine, I'd highly recommend this book!

[Joseph Henry Kester · Rating 4 out of 5]

Fair presentation of each perspective. This book isn't meant, primarily, to change anyone's mind but to foster mutual understanding between Christian brothers and sisters. I can't speak for every position, but my own was well-represented.

[Eli · Rating 4 out of 5]

An essential book for anyone studying the baptism in the Spirit. By reading essays from a variety of perspectives one is able to get a firm handle on the theological and exegetical issues involved in the debate.

[Steve · Rating 3 out of 5]

A reasonable overview of the five different perspectives. However, much of the discussion is weak. I was disappointed with the Reformed view, which lacked sound exegesis, and with the Charismatic view which was rather wishy washy.