I have often heard this book spoken of in hushed tones over the years. It was so well spoken of from so broad a group of people that I looked forward eagerly to a theologically rich, spiritually challenging, profoundly edifying read. I was sorely disappointed.
I'm taking the time to write this review because I hope to spare some other pastor from investing his time in this book. So let me clarify. I benefited from the book. It gave me some good insights into the state of the church in England at a particular point in history. So there is some value in terms of understanding history and historical theology. There were also sections of rich insight (the section on pride in Chapter IV is outstanding!). Let me also clarify that I read from The Practical Works of the Rev. Richard Baxter, Volume XIV rather than the Banner of Truth edition. In my edition, the author often lapses into Latin and Greek, something I suspect the other editions change or translate. I'll also note that in my edition, this is 400 large pages compared to 256 in the BOT edition so it's possible it's been heavily edited in that edition.
So having pointed out that there might be some benefit to reading this book, I want to raise some serious, serious concerns I have with this book.
First, the whole premise of the book is that one of the key aspects of the biblical role of the pastor is to catechise and discipline his people one-on-one. While he allows for the hiring of someone else to help in this ministry, he firmly treats this as obligatory to the pastoral ministry going so far as to repeatedly question the salvation of the minister who doesn't desire to practice it. The problem is that catechism is not biblically mandated or even addressed and therefore cannot possibly be an essential element of the biblical role of pastor. This seems obvious, but is something he never defends biblically. Considering that he spends hundreds of pages pushing this practice forcefully—very forcefully—I'm left feeling that he was too caught up in the traditions of his local, temporal culture to even question the necessity of catechism in the first place. Note that I have no problem with chatichism or catechising. I simply don't accept that it is necessary for believers or essential to the role of the pastor since Scripture does not address it specifically. Ever.
Second, his philosophy of ministry is, to my understanding of Scripture, deeply flawed. He sees ministry as fundamentally hierarchical. I think the biblical model is quite flat. I think the role of the pastor, among other things, is to equip the saints for the work of the ministry (Ephesians 4:12). So that if catechising were the chosen methodology, the goal would be to train every saint to be out doing it. Another major problem here is that he chronically confuses philosophy with methodology so that if we must work for the salvation of souls (philosophy), we must therefore go door-to-door catechising (methodology) or be unfaithful.
Third, his ecclesiology is deeply problematic. Since his tradition leads him to think in terms of parish, he approaches ministry through that paradigm, leading to the notion that he has an obligation to huge numbers of people in the community. His appendix seems to suggest that it is only the people in the parish who profess Christian faith that he is obligated to catechise and discipline, but the point isn't clear throughout. Nevertheless, I think his flawed view of the local church (which is the assembly of the saints identified with each other in a particular place, among other things, I believe) causes him to pile on a workload he admits will shorten the lifespan of those who follow his exhortations.
Fourth, his sacramental view of the ordinances causes him to take on more responsibility (and power) than a non-sacramental view of the ordinances would require (and a biblical view would allow, I believe).
Fifth, there is very little biblical exposition or explication throughout. The whole book is based in the loosest possible way on one passage that doesn't say anything like what he's saying, though his method is one or two of many possible ways to obey the Scriptural command.
Sixth, and now we move from the more theological problems to more intellectual and attitudinal problems, he comes across as a hard nosed, heavy handed taskmaster in approach. He attempts to shame pastors for wanting to provide well for their families. He constantly calls into doubt the sincerity and salvation of those who disagree with him. He sometimes argues with what I would term arrogance and impudence. He's sometimes vicious toward his opponents. It's exactly the spirit that I experienced in my years growing up in extreme Fundamentalism. Even though in most other respects, he is nothing like that Fundamentalism. It is toxic leadership and young pastors should not be looking up to him in this.
Seventh, he lacks balance. He actually argues that a pastor should not engage in recreation. He talks about half an hour of exercise a day total and shames pastors for having hobbies, or going hunting, or going on a holiday. It's the sort of thing you sort of have to see to believe. And then he resorts often—very, very often—to telling you that if you're wasting any time, the blood of the unbelievers is on your hands. It's very unhealthy and unbalanced. His thinking is reductionist, black-and-white, simplistic, fundamentalistic.
Eighth, his logic is not strong. He's just not great at arguing validly.
Ninth, he is pragmatic. Again and again, his standard is what works rather than what is biblical. He then tends to press what works as being biblical because it will work to accomplish the biblical goal in his opinion. This is an example of the confusing of philosophy with methodology mentioned above.
For all these reasons, and others, I would encourage you that if you're looking for a good book to help you grow as a pastor, please don't invest too much time here. I think there are many other contemporary works that will give much more benefit for investment.