Grimsrud asks what Christian theology would be like if it consistently took Jesus' central command to love God and neighbor as the most important consideration. This is why Brenda Martin Hurst, Pastor, Fraser Mennonite Church, says that "Grimsrud's entire theology hinges on these love commands on which Jesus said all the law and the prophets hang." Keith Graber Miller, Goshen College, comments that "Nearly 40 years later, we have another theological extension of John Howard Yoder's Politics of Jesus--an expansive, accessible, provocative, practical, and practice-able theology rooted in the life and teachings of Jesus." Christian Early, Eastern Mennonite University, observes that "Grimsrud recaptures a vision for theology that begins and ends with Jesus, and in so doing manages to call back the discipline from its metaphysical holiday to its home in the life of the messianic community." David Neville, School of Theology, Charles Sturt University, Australia, sees Grimsrud as returning "again and again to Jesus' command to love both God and neighbor as the tuning fork for setting theological convictions in their proper key."
Ted Grimsrud is Professor in the Bible & Religion Dept. of Eastern Mennonite University (EMU).
Prior to teaching at EMU, Ted Grimsrud served 10 years as a pastor in Mennonite churches in Arizona, Oregon and South Dakota. He is especially interested in the connection between Christian theology and pacifism. He teaches classes in theology, peace studies, ethics, and the Bible. He is married to Kathleen Temple and is a grandfather. His website is at peacetheology.net. He hosts a weekly radio program on WEMC (91.7 FM; online at wemcradio.org), called “Wavelength,” where every Saturday at 3 p.m. he plays “the best of popular music at the intersection of country, folk, rock & roll, blues, and gospel.”
Education Ph.D., Graduate Theological Union (1988) M.A., Associated Mennonite Biblical Seminary (1983) B.S., University of Oregon (1976)
Publications Books
Theology as if Jesus Matters: An Introduction to Christianity’s Main Convictions. Cascadia Publishing House, 2009.
Reasoning Together: A Conversation on Homosexuality (with Mark Thiessen Nation). Herald Press, 2008.
Embodying the Way of Jesus: Anabaptist Convictions for the 21st Century. Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2007.
Transforming the Powers: Peace, Justice, and the Domination System (co-editor). Fortress Press, 2006.
God’s Healing Strategy: An Introduction to the Main Themes of the Bible. Cascadia Publishing House, 2001.
Peace and Justice Shall Embrace: Power and Theopolitics in the Bible (co-editor). Cascadia Publishing House, 2000.
Triumph of the Lamb: A Self-Study Guide to the Book of Revelation. Herald Press, 1987.
Articles
“Against Empire: A Yoderian Reading of Romans.” In Sharon L. Baker and Michael Hardin, eds. Peace Be With You: Christ’s Benediction Amid Violent Empires Cascadia, 2010. 120-137.
""Healing Justice. The Mennonite October 20, 2009, 8-10.
“Reflections on J. Denny Weaver’s The Nonviolent Atonement.” Conrad Grebel Review 27.2 (Spring 2009), 4-6.
Thirteen Sunday School lessons. Mennonite Weekly Review May 25, 2009 — August 17, 2009.
Review of Andrew Skotnicki, Criminal Justice and the Catholic Church. Modern Theology. 25.2 (April 2009), 364-67.
“How does Revelation speak today?” The Mennonite (September 2, 2008), 12-14.
“Violence as a Theological Problem.” CJP Web Journal #2 (Winter 2008).
Review of Mark Bredin, Jesus: Revolutionary of Peace. Biblical Theology Bulleton 37.4 (Winter 2007), 186-87.
“A Theology of Welcome.” In Michael A. King, ed., Stumbling Toward a Genuine Conversation on Homosexuality. Cascadia Publishing House, 2007. 237-244.
“The Legacy of CPS: Why Civilian Public Service is Important.” The Mennonite (June 19, 2007), 8-10.
Thirteen Sunday School lessons on Old Testament Prophets. Mennonite Weekly Review (June 3, 2007 – August 26, 2007).
“Walter Wink and Peace Theology.” In Frederich W. Weidmann and D. Sieple, eds. Enigmas and Powers: Engaging the Work of Walter Wink. Pickwick Publications, 2007. 74-78.
“Jesus’ Confrontation with Empire.” In Nathan Yoder and Carol Scheppard, eds. Exiles in Empire. Pandora Press, 2007. 27-41.
Scholarly Presentations “Conversations on Homosexuality: Three Lectures.” Portland Mennonite Church, Portland, OR. February 5-6, 2010.
“Contemporary Theology in Light of Anabaptism” and “Theology as If Jesus Matters.” Papers presented to the London Mennonite Forum. September 10-11, 2009.
“Mercy, Not Sacrifice.” Cross Currents Seminar (Five Lectures). London Mennonite Centre. September 12, 2009.
“A Biblical Understanding of Justice.” Devito Lecture. Waynesburg (PA) University. March 17, 2009.
Justice Apart from the Law (and Empire): Paul’s Deconstruction of Idolatry. American Academy of Religion Annual Meetings. Chicago, November 1, 2008.
World So Full: My Quest for Understanding. Journeys with Jesus Colloquy. Laurelville Mennonite Church Center, October 17-19
It is surprising how little the Nicene Creed says about the life and teachings of Jesus. It basically says he’s God, was killed, and he rose. Nothing is said about what he said or how he lived. And in case you think the Protestant Reformation came up with an improved creed, you won’t learn much more about the teachings of Jesus from the Westminster Confession. You’d think that if Christians wanted to summarize their beliefs into a creed or statement of beliefs that they would include something about his teachings--perhaps something from the Sermon on the Mount such as loving your enemies. But no, instead traditional Christian theology for the past 2000 years has concentrated on Jesus’ identity as God’s Son/Messiah/Christ, not what he taught.
This book takes a look at what Christian theology would look like if Jesus’ words and deeds were truly central. Interestingly, the result is almost a polar opposite to the direction that traditional Christian theology led. With his life being central Jesus becomes a model for authentic human living, and emphasis is given to the social-spiritual context of Jesus’ struggle with the powers of this world. Recognition is given to his genuine struggle to trust God and live faithfully. All these things are very human in their nature, far different from the image of a transcendent, perfect and omnipotent Christ pictured by the traditional creeds.
From this premise Ted Grimsrud provides chapters elaborating on Christ, God, Spirit, creation, revelation, humanity, work of Christ, Christian community, sacraments, religious pluralism, eschatology, and ethics. At the end of the book are responses from five different bible scholars followed by a section where he responds to the responders. There’s plenty of food for thought here worthy of reading by any who are interested in the subject.
This book can be meaningful for Christian readers who are basically comfortable with their religion but would like to move on beyond the "died for my sins" or "go to heaven when I die" clichés. The book articulates an understanding of Christianity that I believe is more mature than that found in traditional theology. It describes what I perceive to be an Anabaptist world view. I've also described this book as a user friendly version of John Howard Yoder's book, The Politics of Jesus.
This book does not address historical scholarship issues related to Jesus, Paul, Bible and the early Christian church. The traditional canon of the Protestant Christian Bible is referenced and accepted in this book with minimal discussion of the relative merits of its various parts. Nor are possible alternative concepts of God discussed. This makes use of this book easily acceptable for those comfortable in a traditional Christian faith. I believe those with a more metaphorical or nuanced understanding of Christian faith can find the book useful too by translating the traditional terms into the meanings or understandings with which they are comfortable.
Some of the commentaries at the end of the book reminded me just how progressive Ted Grimsrud is. One reviewer was critical of Grimsrud's failure to "develop an account of the way in which all human kind is enslaved to cosmic and historical powers..." Grimsrud's reply is to thank him "for illustrating the kind of theology I seek to articulate an alternative to." All I can say to that is, amen.
The following are some quotations from the book I found of interest.
The following comment is referring to John Howard Yoder's writing (p76): "In all of his writings ... he never works very hard at developing a theology of creation. Nor does he seek to elaborate in any detail his claim that the way of Jesus goes with the grain of the cosmos."
The following is taken from the discussion of theological anthropology (p113): "Human beings contain a mixture of attributes that foster a sense of tension. On the one hand, we are limited, finite, and dependent on God and other human beings. On the other hand, we are imaginative, spiritual, and creative. We are limited by our earthiness yet also able to imagine not being limited. We are material creatures with a sense of life beyond the material."
The following is taken from his discussion of atonement theory (p130): "Jesus indeed liberates ("saves"), but he does so simply by announcing that it is so." Regarding Jesus' death, "This death... is not required to bring about the salvation.... Rather, the death stems from the response of the Powers to the salvation already given by God.... Jesus' death adds nothing to the means of salvation."
In his discussion of the "practical value of the church" he says (p139,p140): "Maybe we should think of the church simply as one possible human community.... One reason for bothering with church is...it still serves the life-enhancing role that any authentic human community does. A second kind of reason is a "Christian" one. If we do theology as if Jesus matters ... we will have reasons to bother with the church." Continuing with that thought he says, "...the church is faithful when it self-consciously furthers Jesus' way--through its teaching and preaching, through its worship and communal prayer, through it practices and projects."
Regarding religions other than Christianity he says: "But I don't think he (i.e. Jesus) meant to say that a person must pass some kind of doctrinal test that clearly identifies one as a Christian and gives one a token to use for exclusive access to heaven after one dies. I don't think these words from Jesus were ever meant to negate his call to love our neighbors."
Grimsrud's eschatology is "present-oriented, not future-oriented." The title he gave to that section of the book is, "The End Times Are Now." And when he says "now" he means it was the continuing and present "now" for all who have lived over the past two millennium.
In his discussion of ethics he says: "If I were to try to boil my concerns down to one word, I would be hard pressed to think of a more important word than integrity. Doing theology as if Jesus matters challenges us to work very hard toward coherence between belief and practice, theology and ethics, faith and works."