Irresistible Beauty is a well-argued work that deepens traditional, Reformed notions of regeneration and faith. Without replacing the traditional categories, Parkison argues for an aesthetic dimension to soteriology. He writes, “The fiducia component of saving faith therefore has an accompanying aesthetic aspect; it involves the existential recognition of Christ’s infinite beauty” (15). Thus, for Parkison, and the theologians he invokes along the way, divine beauty is an important layer of saving faith. When God’s Spirit regenerates a sinner, He gives them the necessary faculties to behold the (Christ-mediated) beauty of the Triune God. Overall, Parkison offers a clear and compelling argument for the centrality of divine beauty in our understanding of faith.
Parkison is right to point out that his work fills something of a lacuna in the theological field, especially the Reformed evangelical field. He consistently points to Jonathan King’s fantastic The Beauty of the Lord, which is really the only work like Parkison’s, though it is a biblical-theological treatment. Parkison’s is systematic-theological, in the vein of the Evangelical retrieval moment, stimulated, in part, by the late John Webster’s project to foreground God and His work as the central subject matter of theological inquiry. Thus, some will read Parkison’s work and wonder why his work is, at times, indirectly getting at the question of beauty. In reality, his work is rightly ordered, first exploring divine metaphysics and God’s inner life as the ground for all talk of beauty. This second chapter is, frankly, one of the most significant and unique theological contributions. It demonstrates how God’s simplicity leads us to God’s unchanging, perfect, and plenitudinous life, and “as such, He is the eternal gratuitous source of life and love, and from this overflowing ad intra beatitude, He creates” (83). Indeed, one of my favorite insights from Parkison is that he tethers the doctrine of divine beatitude to divine beauty. What we recognize in God’s Beauty is God’s own delight in Himself, that same delight into which He calls us. Similarly, this chapter demonstrates the fruit of the relationship between metaphysics and theology. Some of the more promising elements of the retrieval movement are on full display in Parkison’s work.
Because some of these categories will be foreign to many Protestants, Parkison rightly includes a (necessarily) long chapter on Reformed soteriology, connecting the covenant of redemption, historia salutis, and the ordo salutis. In this chapter, he demonstrates how his thesis is “not a deviation . . . but rather an accentuation [of Reformed soteriology] through the lens of aesthetics” (205). Though it is a lengthy chapter, the payoff is enormous: there is no trade-off between the traditional Reformed categories and Parkison’s thesis. In fact, they’re mutually enriching. Thus, the Reformed should only feel invigorated and stimulated to follow Parkison’s insights here, especially given how he derives these insights from within the Reformed tradition.
Following this chapter, Parkison sources his argument in sustained exegesis of 2 Corinthians 3:12-4:6, reminding theologians that reflection on the biblical text is fundamental to the theological task. He argues that the glory of Christ, which the Spirit enables us to see, is the same divine glory as the Father and Spirit. Moreover, that there is an aesthetic dimension to belief means there is an aesthetic dimension to unbelief, too. "Unbelief is caused in part by an inability to perceive Christ's glory as beautiful" (180). This corresponds to how Paul and the Psalms talk about the deadening effects of sin. It makes us unable to (spiritually) see and taste that which is Good. Conversely, creaturely participation in the Triune God's beatitude is the Christian's portion, which is vivifying and stimulating. Fundamental to this is a re-tooled understanding of illumination, which is wide enough to describe creaturely reading of Scripture, which the Spirit blesses and sanctifies: "[Christians] read in light of the glory of Jesus Christ, which has shone in their hearts soteriologically and now emanates from Scripture as they read" (193).
One of the great things about this book is that it naturally opens up other vistas of work, ones I hope Parkison will eventually take up. For example, how is the Christian's aesthetic sense grown, exercised, and stimulated? Where does art, poetry, or literature fit into Christian discipleship? How ought divine beauty impact pedagogy? What does a distinctively Reformed aesthetic look like? Perhaps most importantly -- How ought this dimension impact Christian preaching? Fortunately, so much in Parkison’s work points to our theological forebears as exemplars. I think there is more historical retrieval work to be done on Medieval theologians like Bonaventure, Bernard, Hugh of St. Victor, and Catherine of Siena. This is especially true of Hugh, the aptly named “Second Augustine,” whose theological reflections on beauty and wisdom are rightly summed up as “trinitarian aesthetics.” Fortunately, Parkison’s fourth chapter, the chapter-long excursus in Reformed soteriology, demonstrates how we can keep our Reformed bona fides and still acknowledge an aesthetic dimension to regeneration and faith. Scholars like Parkison, who sensibly and sensitively demonstrate the profundities of the Christian tradition while maintaining (and defending!) the genuinely positive recoveries of the Reformation, are the future of the retrieval movement. May God increase their tribe.