Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

A Dictionary Of The Proper Names Of The Old And New Testament Scriptures, Being An Accurate And Literal Translation From The Original Tongues

Rate this book
""A Dictionary of the Proper Names of the Old and New Testament Scriptures"" is a book written by J.B. Jackson and published in 1909. The book is an accurate and literal translation from the original languages, providing readers with a comprehensive guide to the proper names found within the scriptures of the Old and New Testament. The book is organized alphabetically, with each entry providing a detailed description of the name, its origin, and its significance within the context of the Bible. This book is an invaluable resource for scholars, students, and anyone interested in understanding the proper names found within the Bible.This scarce antiquarian book is a facsimile reprint of the old original and may contain some imperfections such as library marks and notations. Because we believe this work is culturally important, we have made it available as part of our commitment for protecting, preserving, and promoting the world's literature in affordable, high quality, modern editions, that are true to their original work.

116 pages, Paperback

First published February 18, 1909

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

J.B. Jackson

3 books

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
8 (66%)
4 stars
3 (25%)
3 stars
1 (8%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for S. Runyan.
136 reviews3 followers
January 22, 2024
A must-have for any Theologian's bookshelf. It is simply a series of pages containing a list of names and their very brief definitions. Most notable among the Author's accomplishments is the preface where he states in humility that there are many thoughts and opinions related to names in the Bible and that this work is HIS understanding, but that he could very well be mistaken and is sure that there are equally as compelling arguments out there that would appear to contradict what he proposes.
Displaying 1 of 1 review