The impetus behind this collection, as explained in the introduction, was to assemble stories to introduce the student to the form of short story and also literature at large. Rather than provide examples of types, it is to address and engage the student's sensitivity and skill as a reader. I didn't really like that many of the stories. Although I've read Hardy, Crane, Hemingway, Thomas, Chekhov, Hawthorne, Joyce, de Maupassant and Lawrence and enjoyed their work. Assembled in 1950, it feels dated not because of the stories individually but collectively. I found it has a strong focus on the dominate, male perspective thus limiting it's appeal.