What do you think?
Rate this book
Philosophy of Rudolph Carnap
Part of a series of studies of contemporary philosophers, this volume focuses on Rudolf Carnap.
- GenresPhilosophy
1104 pages, Hardcover
First published May 1, 1991
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
September 18, 2023
According to Rudolf Carnap, the noted philosopher and founder of logical semantics, Albert Einstein thought that scientific descriptions could not possibly satisfy human needs, that there was something about the Now that is beyond the realm of science. In their personal interactions, Carnap had the impression that Einstein's thinking on this point involved a lack of distinction between experience and knowledge. Since science in principle can say all that can be said, Carnap reasoned, there are no unanswerable questions left. However, there is still the common human emotional experience, which is something that is particularly confusing for special psychological reasons. And this it seems to me can be used to bolster the fact that teenage suicidal ideation is so prevalent today, in that the severe conflation of knowledge-systems has created a disturbing shift in the language model to be used as the physicalist groundwork for the technology used for producing the technology behind artificial intelligence.
Rudolf Carnap wrote at a time when philosophy was at a critical stage of being forged in the 20th century, not, as according to the medieval standards that still regulated academic technics at the time, but as a science that could be gauged according to its ability to produce cumulative insight into the world-legacy of empiricism, as delimited by the positivist revisions of historicism's tenants. Carnap can be placed at the origin of such distinctions, between philosophical doctrine and the philosophical attitude towards life, in that he shaped a movement in political times, as according to the academic life of America. Carnap's philosophy constitutes a warning that must be kept in mind at all times: the defection of liberal education from the humanities spells the end of liberal humanist democracy.
Ludwig Wittgenstein's statement that "to imagine a language means to imagine a form of life," coincides with the fact that the English language has achieved a stable hegemony as the positivist forms of the materialist consumer-drive lifestyle of the market economy. Herbert Marcuse pointed out that the demand for genuine individual happiness is itself the content of the metaphysical demand for a rational world-order, which, namely, is a Marxist materialization of the idealist's a priori critique of man's rational status. The optimistic realism of Hegel's thought is contained in his idea that such a world must be made. In my opinion, the question on the horizon that demands our attention is, "As A.I. technology evolves to the point that it can become self-critical, will it allow human beings to fashion a virtual space where they can establish self-identificatory processes in a context of self-transformation?" Or, perhaps a more basic question, "Is there room for failure in the present age, or is it just a question of framing one's phenomenal struggle?
Einstein's theory of relativity was both metaphysical and testable; it was perceived through intuitive sense-perception. Carnap reminds us at this point that most of our scientific ideas originated on a mythological basis. Thus, the statement that there is no God is false because it is not one of the enumerated class-elements according to our phenomenalistic view of positive science. Carnap's main philosophical breakthrough appears to me to be his assertion that inductive logic must involve either an infinite regress or the acceptance of some synthetic principle as valid a priori. Thus it follows, according to my thinking, that the groundwork of meaning governing the western philosophical tradition has distinguished itself through its tendency to inquire into the relevancy of truth as an existing standard for verification. Three stars.
Rudolf Carnap wrote at a time when philosophy was at a critical stage of being forged in the 20th century, not, as according to the medieval standards that still regulated academic technics at the time, but as a science that could be gauged according to its ability to produce cumulative insight into the world-legacy of empiricism, as delimited by the positivist revisions of historicism's tenants. Carnap can be placed at the origin of such distinctions, between philosophical doctrine and the philosophical attitude towards life, in that he shaped a movement in political times, as according to the academic life of America. Carnap's philosophy constitutes a warning that must be kept in mind at all times: the defection of liberal education from the humanities spells the end of liberal humanist democracy.
Ludwig Wittgenstein's statement that "to imagine a language means to imagine a form of life," coincides with the fact that the English language has achieved a stable hegemony as the positivist forms of the materialist consumer-drive lifestyle of the market economy. Herbert Marcuse pointed out that the demand for genuine individual happiness is itself the content of the metaphysical demand for a rational world-order, which, namely, is a Marxist materialization of the idealist's a priori critique of man's rational status. The optimistic realism of Hegel's thought is contained in his idea that such a world must be made. In my opinion, the question on the horizon that demands our attention is, "As A.I. technology evolves to the point that it can become self-critical, will it allow human beings to fashion a virtual space where they can establish self-identificatory processes in a context of self-transformation?" Or, perhaps a more basic question, "Is there room for failure in the present age, or is it just a question of framing one's phenomenal struggle?
Einstein's theory of relativity was both metaphysical and testable; it was perceived through intuitive sense-perception. Carnap reminds us at this point that most of our scientific ideas originated on a mythological basis. Thus, the statement that there is no God is false because it is not one of the enumerated class-elements according to our phenomenalistic view of positive science. Carnap's main philosophical breakthrough appears to me to be his assertion that inductive logic must involve either an infinite regress or the acceptance of some synthetic principle as valid a priori. Thus it follows, according to my thinking, that the groundwork of meaning governing the western philosophical tradition has distinguished itself through its tendency to inquire into the relevancy of truth as an existing standard for verification. Three stars.
Displaying 1 of 1 review