Granted, I am no fan of profanity, but this book is just ridiculous. I became curious and had to borrow it after I saw a listing of the top ten most poorly written books of all time (needless to say, this book made the list). After checking the book out, I have to concur with the list. The book is written in a patronizing yet terribly immature manner. It’s rather ridiculous and over-the-top. I’m fine with children advocating for improving language usage, but this is a rather lame example of profiteering disguised as social betterment by promoting an awful, poorly-constructed website and club. I also agree with other reviewers that the publishers should be ashamed of themselves for promoting this person as the “most cyber-bullied kid in America” as it becomes quite obvious that this is not the case. With all the true victims of bullying who struggle to make their way through school and life each day, it is a social injustice to lump this kid in with them. I would not recommend this shameful attempt at self-promotion to anyone.
The concept of profanity is subjective. What is considered a vulgar term in one region of the country is sometimes acceptable in another, word meanings vary and so on. Any word labeled as profanity can easily be replaced by another word that may also be deemed profane eventually. Concepts and/or words considered profane or vulgar also change over time. Many words that are commonplace nowadays would have induced gasps a century ago. Words that are not considered profanity can also be abused depending on their usage. Some of the meanest and/or most hurtful phrases I’ve heard or read actually do not contain profane words, rather these phrases consisted of average, everyday words used in an ugly manner. Instead of trying to figure out exactly what constitutes profanity, I think the time and effort expended on the topic could be better used trying to promote civility and decency towards one another. I would rather see someone invest time advocating for social justice through an anti-bullying campaign than advocating for language police.