Author P. M. H. Atwater knows what it's like to die. And the experience so changed her life that she has devoted years to researching the phenomenon of the Near-Death Experience. From her own encounter with life-after-death and from interviews with hundreds of others, she presents this remarkable and reassuring vision into a world beyond the one we know:What it feels like to die, What awaits us after we see the light, Why many who are rescued from death don't want to come back, Why some people encounter hellish experiences, How life changes after a Near-Death Experience And much more!
I read the first two thirds, then it got boring to me. Also her super insistence on the word and existence of "God" is a little unnerving although of course she describes it in the very vast definition, the term God just leaves a bad taste in my mouth, or relatively in my soul. I'd rather die, shoot through the tunnel and possible darkness and past any authority and go explore the universe, remember past lives, view future lives, you know have a cosmic blast. While her book confirms some people's experience of this and of a heaven and hell like experience which seemed to all be based on the psychological belief of each person, I do not want to bow to God. I want to shoot past all hierarchy.
A lot of information on NDE. Very interesting read. Oh and yes, the cover is hideous. I get the light @ the end of the tunnel but why a pixelated image, blurred maybe, pixelated is just not happening. And the cover is depressing, the book tries to be anything but depressing. So a mismatch there.
P.M.H. Atwater (born 1937) has also written books such as 'Coming Back to Life: The After-Effects of the Near-Death Experience' and 'Children of the New Millennium: Children's Near-Death Experiences and the Evolution of Humankind.'
She wrote in the Foreword to this 1994 book, "I am an experiencer. I have lived my research, it has been my life... I have not allowed my multiple experiences with death, what I learned while on The Other Side, my personal bias, or anyone else's research findings to interfere with my work... In order to help my husband keep the bills paid, I have worked as a psychic counselor on the nation's largest 900 line. I am uncomfortable admitting this... Yet there are wonderful, gifted sensitives working the line as I do, and I am proud to be in their number. Continued research without this additional income source would have been impossible." (Pg. ix-xii)
She admits about her own experience that "Since I was never hospitalized, I lack clinical proof that I actually died. It was the specialist's opinion that I did die, however, and that is my own opinion as well." (Pg. 4) She reports that children "were invariably greeted during their death episode by any siblings who died before they did. These siblings told them how they passed over... Future siblings sometimes appeared as well... I have yet to come across an incident where the child experiencer was incorrect about any of these past or future siblings, even when it was absolutely impossible for the child to possess such knowledge." (Pg. 13)
She suggests, "It seems to me that brain chemistry must be affected or altered to some extent during an initial near-death experience... Yet there is more involved here. People who undergo such an event are far more than just 'stimulated.' They seem to 'wake up,' sometimes in substantial ways that can affect them for a lifetime. It takes more than chemicals to accomplish something like that." (Pg. 26)
Of several persons who had "negative" NDEs, she observes, "All three confessed to having hidden within their deepest selves varying types of guilt. This guilt seemed quite painful to them... They admitted to me that they met what they most feared in dying, which confirmed and strengthened their already strong belief that their 'sins' would be punished." (Pg. 36)
Of Maurice Rawlings's book 'Before Death Comes,' she notes, "So far, no other physician has been able to substantiate either the extent of his anecdotal findings or his theory... I have noticed that: Deeply rooted belief systems and regionalisms can color an individual's description and interpretation of his or her experience." (Pg. 38) Still, she later records, "Unpleasant and/or hellish near-death-like experiences also happen." (Pg. 92)
She adds, "I have discovered that those most influenced by Christianity... are the ones MOST LIKELY to describe fire and brimstone and red-hot hells. None of the people I interviewed who were not strongly identified with Christian teachings spoke of any such fiery climate; rather, these people described temperatures that were clammy, cold, lifeless, fearful, or somehow void." (Pg. 168)
Fans of Atwater's other books, or of NDE books in general (particularly the more "metaphysically" or "New Age"-inclined) will like this one as well.
I've read many books on the near death experience but P.M.H Atwater's book far surpasses anything I've read before in information and insights. What sets this book apart is that Atwater had 3 near death experiences herself in 1977, then has devoted her life to researching and understanding exactly how these experiences effect people long term. Most of the best selling books on near death tell you only about the experience itself, but that is but the tip of the iceberg. It's a phenomena that is more common than most people think. One half of adults who have a brush with death report a near death experience and 75% of children. In the United States alone there are more than 8 million people who have had a near death experience. Atwater interviewed over 3,000 individuals who have had a near death experience or NDE and found the experience changes each person in a myriad of ways. There are too many after effects to mention all of them--I highly recommend you read the book. Some of these affects are; they look younger and are more playful, are more sensitive to light and sound, are more open and accepting to new things in life, handle stress more easily, experience an increase in synchronicity, and acquisition of many psychic abilities. This book is certainly worth buying just for the Appendix which lists of wealth of resources on the near death phenomena, resources for the dying, health and healing, mental health with a holistic approach, nutrition, religion, meditation, spirituality, and psychic realities. I've read that the near death experience alters the chemistry of the brain, in essence making this people smarter and more altruistic. This certainly seems to be the case with Atwater; definitely one of the most brilliant books on the subject.
An interesting study in near-death experiences. I like that she didn't balk from the weird bits -- although some of them did leave me blinking. But if you set out to share what people experienced and how they interpreted it, then it's good to relate everything they said and how they felt about it. I found especially interesting the bits about people's negative experiences and the author's thoughts on them. The chapter trying to link near-death phenomenon to physical things (like the brain, electricity and "vibrations") felt a bit pointless. Why should something that happened outside the confines of the physical world need a physical explanation? But I’ve noticed that everyone has some quibble about this book as it bumps up against their way of seeing things. So I suppose that’s mine. Overall I found the book very interesting. 3.5 stars, rounding up to 4.
There are a few actual NDE accounts in the book, then the author explains the effects of an NDE. I prefer books that only contain a collection of near death experiences without lengthy added information.
Paranormal drivel. Unfortunately books like this provide a stigma around NDEs. There is far better well studied and balanced books, lectures, podcasts, and articles on this topic.
I enjoy reading about NDE, but this one was not my favorite. I felt that the author was a bit narcissistic, as she added in her comments towards other people's experiences non objectively. Also, sometimes she would forget to start a new paragraph in order to add her own thoughts on an experience she was retelling. I thought her book seemed hastily written. Also, I thought it would have been smart if she had acknowledged the arguments against the validity of NDE rather than assuming the reader was taking them for granted. She was however very thorough in categorizing experiences into groups, and explaining the effects of each.