An ethnographic study of Indian democracy that shows how agrarian life creates values of citizenship and active engagement that are essential for the cultivation of democracy.
Cultivating Democracy provides a compelling ethnographic analysis of the relationship between formal political institutions and everyday citizenship in rural India.
Banerjee draws on deep engagement with the people and social life in two West Bengal villages from 1998-2013, during election campaigns and in the times between, to show how the micro-politics of their day-to-day life builds active engagement with the macro-politics of state and nation.
Her sensitive analysis focuses on several events in the life of the villages and shows how India's agrarian rural society helps create practices and conceptual space for these citizens to be effective participants in India's great democratic exercises.
Specifically, she shows how the villagers' creative practices around their kinship, farming and religion, while navigating encounters with local communist cadres, constitute a vital and continuing cultivation of those republican virtues of cooperation, civility, solidarity and vigilance which the visionary Ambedkar considered essential for the success of Indian democracy.
At a time when so much of that constitutional vision is under threat, this book provides a crucial scholarly rebuttal to all, on Right or Left, who dismiss rural citizens' political capacities and democratic values. This book will appeal to anyone interested in India's political culture and future, its rural society, or the continuing relevance of political anthropology.
What ultimately held me back from appreciating this book was how convoluted it was, and its lack of clarity. The details were interesting though over-enunciated, and that made it difficult to appreciate it fully.
Disappointing. The author is not open minded; she is coccooned in her socio-history or, probably more so, by ideological inuendos of her sponsors. She analyses covert violence and corruption of the outgoing political formation, but consciously avoids discussing these same tools used by the incoming formation. Even though the study was conducted between 1998 -2013, it was finally published in 2021 and, by then, the well planned systemic corruption and cultural degeneration of the incoming formation were common knowledge. It's strange her analytics never found these markers.