Pain does not fit man s humanity; death is more beautiful, more appropriate. But is the choice between pain and death a fair one? Are painkillers the solution?
I think it s likely that this is the true central point around which the novel revolves. It is a warm dialogue between man possessed by this sort of pain, produced and protected by injustice such that hopelessness might prevail in approaching the idea of society/watan; that the idea of historiography instead take its place as a bearer of the question of whether pain is useful; and that a separation from this tale of Sisyphean outcomes take place and reality, with its gloomy construction of outcomes more dangerous still. Ridding oneself of pain, after all, necessitates measures totally incompatible with the available forms of treatment treatment that preserves the existence of pain while merely increasing one s abilities to bear it.
A great novel talks with many wonderful sight about 'syria' and the conflicts in syria by the viewpoint of citizens, of suffers, real suffers, it's a novel about damascus in the time of war, in the time of all kinds of decrease:
decrease of consciouse, decrease of economecs, decrease of peace.
A story written by looking on the damascus streets and what are change in the hearts and minds of people by all the violent attaks that we already seen by the news
All of us should read this masterpiece by the great writer: hasan sami yousef about the country that impossiple to die
It's a story written in pain and pen (written in the middle of war) In this moment, all the citizens in syria overcome the war, the physical war, now all of them be like what already the writter said in 2015: