What do you think?
Rate this book
Singularity
SINGULARITY is a scifi book that mixes the UNIVERSE, science, physics, adventure, love, romance, faith and religion in an inspiring story about the future of mankind and the decisions that we will make as Species to survive in a world during the 22nd Century.
Author's
Jayme S. Alencar
Jayme is a 6th grader at St. Patrick Catholic School. This is not the first book that he writes. When he was a 3rd grader, he wrote a children book called Brother Bear. Jayme loves to read, science and the Universe. He wants to become an Astronomer.
Jayme A. Oliveira Filho
Jayme is a dentist and amateur Astronomer that lives in Virginia Beach. He loves Astronomy and the Universe. With the help of little Jayme they opened the 1st Astronomy Club at St. Matthews Catholic School. The universe always fascinated him as he watched Carl Sagan in the Cosmos Series when he was a child.
Author's
Jayme S. Alencar
Jayme is a 6th grader at St. Patrick Catholic School. This is not the first book that he writes. When he was a 3rd grader, he wrote a children book called Brother Bear. Jayme loves to read, science and the Universe. He wants to become an Astronomer.
Jayme A. Oliveira Filho
Jayme is a dentist and amateur Astronomer that lives in Virginia Beach. He loves Astronomy and the Universe. With the help of little Jayme they opened the 1st Astronomy Club at St. Matthews Catholic School. The universe always fascinated him as he watched Carl Sagan in the Cosmos Series when he was a child.
85 pages, Kindle Edition
Published November 23, 2020
6 people are currently reading
5 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 34 reviews
April 28, 2025
The concept of “Singularity” is a common one. The disastrous future of earth and space exploration as a solution. Humans are in danger of extinction as the planet has become too damaged to repair and continues to get worse. A scientist named Joseph discovers a new theory that would save humanity. If proven true, humanity would have a means to save themselves. With undying determination and hopefulness, his daughter Daisy and other scientists test the theory. They discover an inhabitable planet across space and with a spaceship created by Daisy ready to depart for a better future. A typical story that appeals to people of the science fiction genre, but some things fall flat in this one.
There is a lot of telling and virtually no showing. For example, “Professors Heart and Christine were impressive scientists”, it’s nice to say that they’re impressive at their profession but the reader should be allowed to gauge that for themselves, not simply through a flat statement.
I would be more invested in the story if characters had characterization beyond them being “professors, scientists, assistant.” Have the characters interact with each other outside of work; Show their nerves and them during leisure time (nobody is working 24 hours a day, they would die, unless they created a drug to keep them going which would also be a fun thing to add.)
Unless they are literal robots without the ability to express themselves, I want to know their fears, not just their hope. Make them feel like real people. Perhaps the main character could have a conversation with her father about their life.
The repetition of “prove the theory” and “prove her father’s theory” and constant mention of “theory” and “being correct” is utterly mind numbing and aggravating because I want to know more but there is nothing to be given.
The main characters emotions are all tied to “proving her father’s theory” which is disturbingly obsessive, or the authors attempt to remind the readers like children with severe ADD.
Another example, “Earth has sustained irreversible damage”, explaining in a little more detail to help the reader visualize the situation, such as “99% of previously functioning farms were barren and were not likely to produce without significant climate cooling” or “the ocean level submerged approximately half the continents and the countries therein” would be more interesting. Specifics help worldbuilding; Numbers and descriptions that compare the now and the future show the reader their dire position. Describing the scientific elements: meteorites, climate, and theories are only interesting to a certain degree. I really don’t want to say that the story drones on without much excitement, but it does.
However, there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Chapters 8, 9, 10, and 12 are brief for brevity’s sake and I enjoyed them the most.
Chapters 7, 9, and 10, “Frenemies”, “Lunar Romance”, and “The Journey” respectively, have what I was looking for in at least chapters 2 through 6. A sense of these people being real by giving a means of connection with others. The last four chapters are significantly better because of the increased human connection.
Some other major things that are overlooked are whether the comparable elements of the new planet are habitable long term. If the air has too much or little nitrogen and oxygen, how would that affect them? What about seasons, water, gravity, soil, how’s the food situation? Knowing that they have no other choice, they should have also prepared suits and other means of protecting themselves since the scientists didn’t test these levels. In addition, how durable is the ship anyway? It’s all too convenient.
Overall, the lack of intimacy between characters and barely if at all a personality to speak of in the main body, and other interests beyond the mission to save humanity makes it very one note. But I will say that the authors already have a lot to work with so adjustments shouldn’t be too difficult. I’ll give it 3 out of 5 because most of the work is there. Each chapter has its strengths and weaknesses. Needs some livening up for sure.
There is a lot of telling and virtually no showing. For example, “Professors Heart and Christine were impressive scientists”, it’s nice to say that they’re impressive at their profession but the reader should be allowed to gauge that for themselves, not simply through a flat statement.
I would be more invested in the story if characters had characterization beyond them being “professors, scientists, assistant.” Have the characters interact with each other outside of work; Show their nerves and them during leisure time (nobody is working 24 hours a day, they would die, unless they created a drug to keep them going which would also be a fun thing to add.)
Unless they are literal robots without the ability to express themselves, I want to know their fears, not just their hope. Make them feel like real people. Perhaps the main character could have a conversation with her father about their life.
The repetition of “prove the theory” and “prove her father’s theory” and constant mention of “theory” and “being correct” is utterly mind numbing and aggravating because I want to know more but there is nothing to be given.
The main characters emotions are all tied to “proving her father’s theory” which is disturbingly obsessive, or the authors attempt to remind the readers like children with severe ADD.
Another example, “Earth has sustained irreversible damage”, explaining in a little more detail to help the reader visualize the situation, such as “99% of previously functioning farms were barren and were not likely to produce without significant climate cooling” or “the ocean level submerged approximately half the continents and the countries therein” would be more interesting. Specifics help worldbuilding; Numbers and descriptions that compare the now and the future show the reader their dire position. Describing the scientific elements: meteorites, climate, and theories are only interesting to a certain degree. I really don’t want to say that the story drones on without much excitement, but it does.
However, there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Chapters 8, 9, 10, and 12 are brief for brevity’s sake and I enjoyed them the most.
Chapters 7, 9, and 10, “Frenemies”, “Lunar Romance”, and “The Journey” respectively, have what I was looking for in at least chapters 2 through 6. A sense of these people being real by giving a means of connection with others. The last four chapters are significantly better because of the increased human connection.
Some other major things that are overlooked are whether the comparable elements of the new planet are habitable long term. If the air has too much or little nitrogen and oxygen, how would that affect them? What about seasons, water, gravity, soil, how’s the food situation? Knowing that they have no other choice, they should have also prepared suits and other means of protecting themselves since the scientists didn’t test these levels. In addition, how durable is the ship anyway? It’s all too convenient.
Overall, the lack of intimacy between characters and barely if at all a personality to speak of in the main body, and other interests beyond the mission to save humanity makes it very one note. But I will say that the authors already have a lot to work with so adjustments shouldn’t be too difficult. I’ll give it 3 out of 5 because most of the work is there. Each chapter has its strengths and weaknesses. Needs some livening up for sure.
January 31, 2024
While this book is marketed to Middle Grades and Young Adults, based on my reading of it, I’d say it’s more suitable for Middle Grades, and that Young Adults will find the story and style less entertaining.
The book has three heroes, Joseph, Daisy and Alexander, three generations of a family of scientists who will work to provide a solution to keeping mankind alive on a dying Earth. These three, father, daughter, and grandson, are described as devout Catholics, whose faith helps keep them going when doubters abound. It is Joseph who has the breakthrough idea on how to save mankind. The “Singularity” of the title is not just a singular event, nomenclature notwithstanding, but a number of different singularities needed for Joseph’s idea to come to fruition. To wit, the idea is to find an alternate Earth-like planet, reached through the wormhole created by a black hole.
Joseph will devote his life to the theories required to bring his idea to fruition. It was not an easy life, because, as the authors put it, “He became the joke of the science community, ridiculed, and ostracized by the same colleagues and institutions that one day would applaud him for his achievements in astrophysics.”
Seeing how her father was mistreated drives Daisy, who goes to MIT and pursues a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering, to work on her father’s project. While her father was the idea and theories person, Daisy and her team will work on the projects that can turn his ideas into reality. One of those projects is constructing spaceships that can handle the immense gravity of passing through a black hole. The initial spaceship will release probes to search for a hospitable planet. A final spaceship to take Earth colonizers to the new planet. Joseph’s grandson, Daisy’s son Alexander will wind up piloting that ship.
Before the start of the story, the authors have a “Summary” of the year 2020, stating that Climate Change and Global Warming have caused serious worldwide issues and that their book is a sci-fi take on what mankind will continue to face. I have a bit of an issue with some of the statements in this "Summary" which are presented as fact. Yes, there were warnings from scientists in the 1980s. Yet some of those same scientists said England would be underwater now. My point is that if you’re writing a science fiction book, keep the science fiction to the story and don’t introduce as fact issues that are still the subject of scientific debate.
This is a story of man’s faith and perseverance in the face of insurmountable odds and adversity. The Catholic faith is instrumental in Joseph’s and Daisy’s ability to continue to work on what they believe is right, when all around them they face ridicule. It’ll also be key in some decisions that Alexander must make. Although all three are described as devout Catholics, both Daisy and Alexander engage in pre-marital sex. Various concepts are sometimes explained in layman’s terms, sometimes just more confusingly, although not always at first mention. For example, spaghettification comes up on page 38 but is not explained until it’s mentioned again on page 47. There are some flaws in logic, e.g. the US National Security Administration taking immediate charge of a meteorite that lands in the Sahara Desert or our heroes having technical knowledge just because it’ll help them at that time, that will likely be overlooked by the middle-grade audience. Others, such as the selection process for the spaceship, they might wonder about. One of the biggest problems with this book is the lack of editing. The copy I read is the second edition. Even so, it is chock full of spelling and grammatical errors. Tenses change mid-sentence. There were two paragraphs I couldn’t make any sense of.
That's why I could only give it 2 stars. This book is chock full of errors and could use some serious editing work. I made over 70 annotations on its 83 pages. I would recommend this book to fans of science fiction, especially those of the Catholic faith, as part of the storytelling is on the coexistence of science and faith.
The book has three heroes, Joseph, Daisy and Alexander, three generations of a family of scientists who will work to provide a solution to keeping mankind alive on a dying Earth. These three, father, daughter, and grandson, are described as devout Catholics, whose faith helps keep them going when doubters abound. It is Joseph who has the breakthrough idea on how to save mankind. The “Singularity” of the title is not just a singular event, nomenclature notwithstanding, but a number of different singularities needed for Joseph’s idea to come to fruition. To wit, the idea is to find an alternate Earth-like planet, reached through the wormhole created by a black hole.
Joseph will devote his life to the theories required to bring his idea to fruition. It was not an easy life, because, as the authors put it, “He became the joke of the science community, ridiculed, and ostracized by the same colleagues and institutions that one day would applaud him for his achievements in astrophysics.”
Seeing how her father was mistreated drives Daisy, who goes to MIT and pursues a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering, to work on her father’s project. While her father was the idea and theories person, Daisy and her team will work on the projects that can turn his ideas into reality. One of those projects is constructing spaceships that can handle the immense gravity of passing through a black hole. The initial spaceship will release probes to search for a hospitable planet. A final spaceship to take Earth colonizers to the new planet. Joseph’s grandson, Daisy’s son Alexander will wind up piloting that ship.
Before the start of the story, the authors have a “Summary” of the year 2020, stating that Climate Change and Global Warming have caused serious worldwide issues and that their book is a sci-fi take on what mankind will continue to face. I have a bit of an issue with some of the statements in this "Summary" which are presented as fact. Yes, there were warnings from scientists in the 1980s. Yet some of those same scientists said England would be underwater now. My point is that if you’re writing a science fiction book, keep the science fiction to the story and don’t introduce as fact issues that are still the subject of scientific debate.
This is a story of man’s faith and perseverance in the face of insurmountable odds and adversity. The Catholic faith is instrumental in Joseph’s and Daisy’s ability to continue to work on what they believe is right, when all around them they face ridicule. It’ll also be key in some decisions that Alexander must make. Although all three are described as devout Catholics, both Daisy and Alexander engage in pre-marital sex. Various concepts are sometimes explained in layman’s terms, sometimes just more confusingly, although not always at first mention. For example, spaghettification comes up on page 38 but is not explained until it’s mentioned again on page 47. There are some flaws in logic, e.g. the US National Security Administration taking immediate charge of a meteorite that lands in the Sahara Desert or our heroes having technical knowledge just because it’ll help them at that time, that will likely be overlooked by the middle-grade audience. Others, such as the selection process for the spaceship, they might wonder about. One of the biggest problems with this book is the lack of editing. The copy I read is the second edition. Even so, it is chock full of spelling and grammatical errors. Tenses change mid-sentence. There were two paragraphs I couldn’t make any sense of.
That's why I could only give it 2 stars. This book is chock full of errors and could use some serious editing work. I made over 70 annotations on its 83 pages. I would recommend this book to fans of science fiction, especially those of the Catholic faith, as part of the storytelling is on the coexistence of science and faith.
September 28, 2025
Short science-fiction novel about a multigenerational team of space scientists saving the human race, or what's left of it.
Deep into the 21st century, global warming and overpopulation are clear signs that the Earth has little time left to support life. In the USA, Joseph Silva, a brilliant astronomer from a devout Catholic-Christian Brazilian-immigrant family, watching his daughter Daisy, has a brainstorm about black holes leading to other universes; anything strong enough to travel through the "singularity" of the black hole can traverse the cosmos and potentially locate other Earth-like habitats. Joseph's daughter/muse Daisy also grows up to be a scientist herself. She works at NASA on projects to confirm her father's theories and make his dream a reality, finding a new world to colonize before humanity perishes. The God-given gift of a meteorite laden with the unknown metal alloy "Munerium" enables construction of extremely strong space probes and ships to survive the black hole's gravity. Daisy in turn gives birth to a son, Alexander, who will be instrumental to the planned mission through the Singularity in the year 2135.
The fast-moving tale cites sources ranging from Albert Einstein to Carl Sagan to the Book of Genesis (and it would seem a fair astrophysical analysis to toss the 2014 Hollywood movie Interstellar in there too). The language of the narrative is related in a colloquial style more akin to a lecture hall than a hard-SF tome: "But like we mentioned in the previous chapter, these kinds of developments take ample time to bring to completion. No one really wants to produce something that takes that amount of knowledge and time only for it to falter in the end. This is the same thing as what happened in the previous chapter with Joseph and Daisy." While there are some mind-stretching digressions into Relativity in space-time and quantum entanglement, super-simplified plotting and (largely) non-technical prose make the slim volume more for the cosmos of YA- and J-level readerships.
Note to sticklers: If my online research is accurate, the book was subsequently issued as a fixup entitled "Knight Discoverer."
Deep into the 21st century, global warming and overpopulation are clear signs that the Earth has little time left to support life. In the USA, Joseph Silva, a brilliant astronomer from a devout Catholic-Christian Brazilian-immigrant family, watching his daughter Daisy, has a brainstorm about black holes leading to other universes; anything strong enough to travel through the "singularity" of the black hole can traverse the cosmos and potentially locate other Earth-like habitats. Joseph's daughter/muse Daisy also grows up to be a scientist herself. She works at NASA on projects to confirm her father's theories and make his dream a reality, finding a new world to colonize before humanity perishes. The God-given gift of a meteorite laden with the unknown metal alloy "Munerium" enables construction of extremely strong space probes and ships to survive the black hole's gravity. Daisy in turn gives birth to a son, Alexander, who will be instrumental to the planned mission through the Singularity in the year 2135.
The fast-moving tale cites sources ranging from Albert Einstein to Carl Sagan to the Book of Genesis (and it would seem a fair astrophysical analysis to toss the 2014 Hollywood movie Interstellar in there too). The language of the narrative is related in a colloquial style more akin to a lecture hall than a hard-SF tome: "But like we mentioned in the previous chapter, these kinds of developments take ample time to bring to completion. No one really wants to produce something that takes that amount of knowledge and time only for it to falter in the end. This is the same thing as what happened in the previous chapter with Joseph and Daisy." While there are some mind-stretching digressions into Relativity in space-time and quantum entanglement, super-simplified plotting and (largely) non-technical prose make the slim volume more for the cosmos of YA- and J-level readerships.
Note to sticklers: If my online research is accurate, the book was subsequently issued as a fixup entitled "Knight Discoverer."
September 30, 2023
"Singularity" by Jayme A Oliveira Filho is a literary marvel that challenges the boundaries of science fiction. This thought-provoking odyssey invites readers into a world where science, philosophy, faith, and human emotions collide in a symphony of ideas.
At its core, "Singularity" explores the possibilities and consequences of scientific advancements in the 22nd century. Oliveira Filho's storytelling prowess shines as he navigates complex scientific concepts and presents them in a digestible yet intellectually stimulating manner. The narrative revolves around Joseph Silva, an astrophysicist with a groundbreaking theory that could reshape humanity's understanding of the universe. His journey, filled with challenges and triumphs, serves as the perfect backdrop for a deeper exploration of human nature and the ethical dilemmas posed by scientific progress.
What sets this book apart is its ability to seamlessly weave together intricate scientific ideas with profound philosophical questions. It invites readers to contemplate the intersections of science, spirituality, and morality. As we follow Joseph and his daughter Daisy on their quests, we are prompted to question our own beliefs and ponder the potential impact of our decisions on the future of humanity.
Oliveira Filho's writing is both eloquent and evocative. It effortlessly transports readers to a world where the boundaries between reality and imagination blur. The characters, particularly Daisy, are well-developed and relatable, making it easy to invest emotionally in their journeys.
"Singularity" is not just a science fiction novel; it is a philosophical treatise on the human condition. It challenges us to consider the implications of our actions, the power of our beliefs, and the responsibility we bear as stewards of knowledge. It is a book that resonates deeply, leaving a lasting imprint on the mind and heart.
At its core, "Singularity" explores the possibilities and consequences of scientific advancements in the 22nd century. Oliveira Filho's storytelling prowess shines as he navigates complex scientific concepts and presents them in a digestible yet intellectually stimulating manner. The narrative revolves around Joseph Silva, an astrophysicist with a groundbreaking theory that could reshape humanity's understanding of the universe. His journey, filled with challenges and triumphs, serves as the perfect backdrop for a deeper exploration of human nature and the ethical dilemmas posed by scientific progress.
What sets this book apart is its ability to seamlessly weave together intricate scientific ideas with profound philosophical questions. It invites readers to contemplate the intersections of science, spirituality, and morality. As we follow Joseph and his daughter Daisy on their quests, we are prompted to question our own beliefs and ponder the potential impact of our decisions on the future of humanity.
Oliveira Filho's writing is both eloquent and evocative. It effortlessly transports readers to a world where the boundaries between reality and imagination blur. The characters, particularly Daisy, are well-developed and relatable, making it easy to invest emotionally in their journeys.
"Singularity" is not just a science fiction novel; it is a philosophical treatise on the human condition. It challenges us to consider the implications of our actions, the power of our beliefs, and the responsibility we bear as stewards of knowledge. It is a book that resonates deeply, leaving a lasting imprint on the mind and heart.
September 30, 2023
"Singularity" by Jayme A Oliveira Filho is a literary masterpiece that seamlessly fuses science fiction with profound philosophical exploration. Set in the 22nd century, this novel takes readers on a mind-bending journey through the cosmos, where scientific advancements, spirituality, and the choices that define humanity intertwine.
At its core, the narrative revolves around Joseph Silva, a brilliant astrophysicist whose groundbreaking theory challenges established scientific paradigms. Yet, it's not just Joseph's intellect that captivates; it's his unyielding determination and the unwavering support of his daughter, Daisy, that make the story truly compelling. Oliveira Filho navigates complex scientific concepts with finesse, making them accessible to readers from all backgrounds.
What sets "Singularity" apart is its ability to ignite contemplation. The novel encourages readers to grapple with ethical dilemmas and the profound responsibility that accompanies scientific progress. It challenges us to reflect on the choices we make as a species and the potential consequences of our actions.
Character development is a highlight of the book. Joseph and Daisy are multifaceted protagonists, each on a personal journey that mirrors the broader themes of the narrative. Daisy, in particular, emerges as a symbol of resilience and unwavering belief in her father's vision, adding emotional depth to the story.
In summary, "Singularity" is a triumph of storytelling that invites readers on an intellectual and emotional odyssey. It is a profound exploration of the choices that define humanity and the intricate interplay between science, spirituality, and morality. Oliveira Filho's narrative is both enlightening and emotionally resonant, leaving an indelible mark on those who embark on this extraordinary journey.
At its core, the narrative revolves around Joseph Silva, a brilliant astrophysicist whose groundbreaking theory challenges established scientific paradigms. Yet, it's not just Joseph's intellect that captivates; it's his unyielding determination and the unwavering support of his daughter, Daisy, that make the story truly compelling. Oliveira Filho navigates complex scientific concepts with finesse, making them accessible to readers from all backgrounds.
What sets "Singularity" apart is its ability to ignite contemplation. The novel encourages readers to grapple with ethical dilemmas and the profound responsibility that accompanies scientific progress. It challenges us to reflect on the choices we make as a species and the potential consequences of our actions.
Character development is a highlight of the book. Joseph and Daisy are multifaceted protagonists, each on a personal journey that mirrors the broader themes of the narrative. Daisy, in particular, emerges as a symbol of resilience and unwavering belief in her father's vision, adding emotional depth to the story.
In summary, "Singularity" is a triumph of storytelling that invites readers on an intellectual and emotional odyssey. It is a profound exploration of the choices that define humanity and the intricate interplay between science, spirituality, and morality. Oliveira Filho's narrative is both enlightening and emotionally resonant, leaving an indelible mark on those who embark on this extraordinary journey.
September 18, 2021
This work had an interesting premise and could have had a good message, but it was overshadowed by the amount of errors found throughout the entire book. There were also many sentences that I had to read several times to make sense of them; the phrasing was awkward and not understandable. The characters were also not engaging at all. They lacked personality and didn’t feel realistic or relatable, making the whole book boring.
The point of view also switched between the third and first person randomly and not in a way that forwarded the story. For example, there were many interjections that were essentially like, “Oh this reminds me of the time we talked to a friend who makes cars…” then goes on for another several paragraphs. These interjections did not add to the story and interrupted it in a way that detracted from it.
The point of view also switched between the third and first person randomly and not in a way that forwarded the story. For example, there were many interjections that were essentially like, “Oh this reminds me of the time we talked to a friend who makes cars…” then goes on for another several paragraphs. These interjections did not add to the story and interrupted it in a way that detracted from it.
October 7, 2023
"SINGULARITY" is a delight for physics enthusiasts. It delves deep into the realms of quantum mechanics, string theory, and the mysteries of the universe. The authors' grasp of these complex concepts is impressive, and they manage to convey them in a way that is both comprehensible and thrilling. From the manipulation of spacetime to the exploration of alternate dimensions, the book's scientific elements are both mind-bending and intellectually satisfying. If you're someone who relishes the idea of harnessing the fundamental forces of the universe, this book is a must-read.
October 1, 2023
"Singularity" is a brilliant fusion of science, philosophy, and human emotion. Jayme A Oliveira Filho takes readers on a mesmerizing journey through the cosmos, challenging our understanding of the universe and our place within it. The characters, especially Joseph and Daisy, are beautifully developed, and their quests become a reflection of our own existential questions. A thought-provoking masterpiece!
September 30, 2023
"Singularity" by Jayme A Oliveira Filho is a captivating voyage into the 22nd century, where science, faith, and humanity collide in a thrilling narrative. This thought-provoking blend of science fiction, romance, and philosophy is a must-read for anyone who enjoys exploring the profound questions of our existence.
September 30, 2023
"Singularity" is an intellectual masterpiece that invites readers to embark on an epic journey through time, space, and the human soul. Oliveira Filho's narrative is a thought-provoking exploration of the decisions that will shape our species' future, making it a must-read for fans of science fiction and philosophy alike.
October 1, 2023
"Singularity" is a mind-bending exploration of science and spirituality. Oliveira Filho's storytelling is captivating as it delves into complex scientific concepts while addressing profound philosophical questions. The characters are relatable, and their journeys resonate on both intellectual and emotional levels. A must-read for those who seek to ponder the mysteries of the universe.
October 1, 2023
"Singularity" is a thought-provoking and intellectually stimulating masterpiece. Oliveira Filho effortlessly blends science, philosophy, and spirituality into a captivating narrative. Joseph and Daisy's journeys are filled with depth and emotion, making this book a truly engaging experience for readers who crave profound exploration.
October 7, 2023
"Singularity" is a triumph of storytelling that bridges the gap between science fiction and philosophy. Oliveira Filho's narrative is a captivating exploration of the cosmos, human choices, and the consequences of scientific progress. The characters, especially Daisy, are brilliantly crafted, and their quests are both enlightening and emotionally resonant.
October 7, 2023
"Singularity" is a profound journey into the realms of science and spirituality. Oliveira Filho's storytelling is both eloquent and thought-provoking. The characters are relatable, and their moral dilemmas add depth to the narrative. A compelling read for anyone interested in the intersection of science and philosophy.
October 7, 2023
"Singularity" is a mind-expanding odyssey that challenges the boundaries of science fiction. Oliveira Filho's narrative is a brilliant blend of science, philosophy, and spirituality. Joseph and Daisy are captivating characters on a quest that mirrors the larger questions about human existence. A truly thought-provoking and enlightening read.
October 7, 2023
"Singularity" is a thought-provoking exploration of science, philosophy, and the human condition. Oliveira Filho's narrative is intellectually stimulating and emotionally resonant. The characters, especially Daisy, are well-developed and relatable. A compelling read for those who seek to ponder the mysteries of the universe.
October 7, 2023
"Singularity" is a captivating journey into the realms of science and philosophy. Oliveira Filho's narrative is both intellectually stimulating and emotionally engaging. The characters, particularly Daisy, add depth to the story, making it a profound exploration of human nature and scientific progress.
October 7, 2023
"Singularity" is a masterpiece that seamlessly blends science fiction with philosophy. Oliveira Filho's narrative is a captivating exploration of the cosmos, human choices, and the moral implications of scientific progress. The characters, especially Daisy, are brilliantly crafted, adding depth to the story.
October 7, 2023
"Singularity" is a thought-provoking and emotionally resonant masterpiece. Oliveira Filho's narrative seamlessly combines science, philosophy, and spirituality into a captivating exploration of the human condition. Joseph and Daisy's journeys are filled with depth and complexity, making this book a must-read for anyone seeking profound insight.
September 30, 2023
"Singularity" offers a gripping fusion of science and spirituality, taking readers on an exhilarating journey through the cosmos. Oliveira Filho skillfully crafts a narrative that challenges our perceptions of the future and our role in it.
September 30, 2023
This book is a symphony of ideas and emotions. "Singularity" seamlessly blends science and philosophy into an epic tale that leaves you questioning the very essence of human existence. A masterpiece that lingers in your thoughts long after you've turned the last page.
September 30, 2023
"Singularity" is a breathtaking exploration of the universe, faith, and the choices that define us. Oliveira Filho's storytelling is nothing short of mesmerizing, and the narrative's depth invites readers to embark on an intellectual and emotional journey.
September 30, 2023
A remarkable fusion of science and spirituality, "Singularity" is a captivating read that challenges the boundaries of the science-fiction genre. Oliveira Filho's narrative is an evocative meditation on the future of mankind.
September 30, 2023
"Singularity" is a thought-provoking odyssey that masterfully blends science, philosophy, and adventure. Oliveira Filho's storytelling is both enlightening and emotionally resonant, making this book a profound exploration of our place in the universe.
September 30, 2023
A visionary work that transcends genre, "Singularity" offers a riveting glimpse into the future of humanity. Oliveira Filho's narrative is an intellectual and emotional rollercoaster that challenges readers to ponder the decisions that will shape our species.
September 30, 2023
"Singularity" is a tour de force of science fiction that defies convention. Oliveira Filho's narrative skillfully navigates the complexities of science, faith, and human nature, leaving readers with a profound sense of wonder and introspection.
March 27, 2021
Interesting tale
The story was good. For me I don't want a science class. The characters were believable and the plot plausable
The story was good. For me I don't want a science class. The characters were believable and the plot plausable
April 7, 2021
Very good book.
Explains the consequences of Climate Change and it shows a profound knowledge of Astronomy.
I would definitely recommended.
Explains the consequences of Climate Change and it shows a profound knowledge of Astronomy.
I would definitely recommended.
October 17, 2023
While this book is marketed to Middle Grades and Young Adults, based on my reading of it, I’d say it’s more suitable for Middle Grades, and that Young Adults will find the story and style less entertaining.
The book has three heroes, Joseph, Daisy and Alexander, three generations of a family of scientists who will work to provide a solution to keeping mankind alive on a dying Earth. These three, father, daughter, and grandson, are described as devout Catholics, whose faith helps keep them going when doubters abound. It is Joseph who has the breakthrough idea on how to save mankind. The “Singularity” of the title is not just a singular event, nomenclature notwithstanding, but a number of different singularities needed for Joseph’s idea to come to fruition. To wit, the idea is to find an alternate Earth-like planet, reached through the wormhole created by a black hole.
Joseph will devote his life to the theories required to bring his idea to fruition. It was not an easy life, because, as the authors put it, “He became the joke of the science community, ridiculed, and ostracized by the same colleagues and institutions that one day would applaud him for his achievements in astrophysics.”
Seeing how her father was mistreated drives Daisy, who goes to MIT and pursues a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering, to work on her father’s project. While her father was the idea and theories person, Daisy and her team will work on the projects that can turn his ideas into reality. One of those projects is constructing spaceships that can handle the immense gravity of passing through a black hole. The initial spaceship will release probes to search for a hospitable planet. A final spaceship to take Earth colonizers to the new planet. Joseph’s grandson, Daisy’s son Alexander will wind up piloting that ship.
Before the start of the story, the authors have a “Summary” of the year 2020, stating that Climate Change and Global Warming have caused serious worldwide issues and that their book is a sci-fi take on what mankind will continue to face. I have a bit of an issue with some of the statements in this "Summary" which are presented as fact. Yes, there were warnings from scientists in the 1980s. Yet some of those same scientists said England would be underwater now. My point is that if you’re writing a science fiction book, keep the science fiction to the story and don’t introduce as fact issues that are still the subject of scientific debate.
This is a story of man’s faith and perseverance in the face of insurmountable odds and adversity. The Catholic faith is instrumental in Joseph’s and Daisy’s ability to continue to work on what they believe is right, when all around them they face ridicule. It’ll also be key in some decisions that Alexander must make. Although all three are described as devout Catholics, both Daisy and Alexander engage in pre-marital sex. Various concepts are sometimes explained in layman’s terms, sometimes just more confusingly, although not always at first mention. For example, spaghettification comes up on page 38 but is not explained until it’s mentioned again on page 47. There are some flaws in logic, e.g. the US National Security Administration taking immediate charge of a meteorite that lands in the Sahara Desert or our heroes having technical knowledge just because it’ll help them at that time, that will likely be overlooked by the middle-grade audience. Others, such as the selection process for the spaceship, they might wonder about. One of the biggest problems with this book is the lack of editing. The copy I read is the second edition. Even so, it is chock full of spelling and grammatical errors. Tenses change mid-sentence. There were two paragraphs I couldn’t make any sense of.
That's why I could only give it 2 stars. This book is chock full of errors and could use some serious editing work. I made over 70 annotations on its 83 pages. I would recommend this book to fans of science fiction, especially those of the Catholic faith, as part of the storytelling is on the coexistence of science and faith.
The book has three heroes, Joseph, Daisy and Alexander, three generations of a family of scientists who will work to provide a solution to keeping mankind alive on a dying Earth. These three, father, daughter, and grandson, are described as devout Catholics, whose faith helps keep them going when doubters abound. It is Joseph who has the breakthrough idea on how to save mankind. The “Singularity” of the title is not just a singular event, nomenclature notwithstanding, but a number of different singularities needed for Joseph’s idea to come to fruition. To wit, the idea is to find an alternate Earth-like planet, reached through the wormhole created by a black hole.
Joseph will devote his life to the theories required to bring his idea to fruition. It was not an easy life, because, as the authors put it, “He became the joke of the science community, ridiculed, and ostracized by the same colleagues and institutions that one day would applaud him for his achievements in astrophysics.”
Seeing how her father was mistreated drives Daisy, who goes to MIT and pursues a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering, to work on her father’s project. While her father was the idea and theories person, Daisy and her team will work on the projects that can turn his ideas into reality. One of those projects is constructing spaceships that can handle the immense gravity of passing through a black hole. The initial spaceship will release probes to search for a hospitable planet. A final spaceship to take Earth colonizers to the new planet. Joseph’s grandson, Daisy’s son Alexander will wind up piloting that ship.
Before the start of the story, the authors have a “Summary” of the year 2020, stating that Climate Change and Global Warming have caused serious worldwide issues and that their book is a sci-fi take on what mankind will continue to face. I have a bit of an issue with some of the statements in this "Summary" which are presented as fact. Yes, there were warnings from scientists in the 1980s. Yet some of those same scientists said England would be underwater now. My point is that if you’re writing a science fiction book, keep the science fiction to the story and don’t introduce as fact issues that are still the subject of scientific debate.
This is a story of man’s faith and perseverance in the face of insurmountable odds and adversity. The Catholic faith is instrumental in Joseph’s and Daisy’s ability to continue to work on what they believe is right, when all around them they face ridicule. It’ll also be key in some decisions that Alexander must make. Although all three are described as devout Catholics, both Daisy and Alexander engage in pre-marital sex. Various concepts are sometimes explained in layman’s terms, sometimes just more confusingly, although not always at first mention. For example, spaghettification comes up on page 38 but is not explained until it’s mentioned again on page 47. There are some flaws in logic, e.g. the US National Security Administration taking immediate charge of a meteorite that lands in the Sahara Desert or our heroes having technical knowledge just because it’ll help them at that time, that will likely be overlooked by the middle-grade audience. Others, such as the selection process for the spaceship, they might wonder about. One of the biggest problems with this book is the lack of editing. The copy I read is the second edition. Even so, it is chock full of spelling and grammatical errors. Tenses change mid-sentence. There were two paragraphs I couldn’t make any sense of.
That's why I could only give it 2 stars. This book is chock full of errors and could use some serious editing work. I made over 70 annotations on its 83 pages. I would recommend this book to fans of science fiction, especially those of the Catholic faith, as part of the storytelling is on the coexistence of science and faith.
September 23, 2023
Definitely fiction and disturbing (not in a good way)
I was hoping the ending might save this book, and there could have been a great one, but what should have been a dire warning stayed the course of being a farce.
Writing a book, even a bad one, isn’t easy, so two stars for the effort, and I’m glad the author cares about climate change, but this book exemplifies the magical thinking that has led us to the current state of the world.
It’s science fiction, and I’m willing to suspend belief to a point, but this book discusses the consequences of climate change affecting us now as occurring 50 years from now, there is a scientific consensus that we have 7 to 20 years left before the modern world as we know it is lost irretrievably (and as more data pours in, this timeline gets shorter), scientists are not optimistic—one climate scientist set himself on fire—and at the rate NASA continues to be defunded, it’s doubtful that it will exist in 50 years from now even if by some miracle we manage to salvage a few shreds of the modern civilization we’ve taken for granted.
Faith in god is not going to save us, and does humanity really deserve a second chance, or a new planet to destroy?
Scientists question their assumptions and it takes perseverance if you think you’ve almost figured something out, but the numbers and data that run the modern world don’t lie and we’ve had the technology to prevent or at least severely mitigate anthropogenic climate change for over 70 years, but we can’t overcome our irrational fears.
There is a scientific consensus that nuclear power is our best, cheapest, greenest, safest and only viable option as a primary energy source, and a growing consensus that wind and solar are a net loss. What you or I think doesn’t matter.
I analyzed data in graduate school. It didn’t always tell me what I wanted to hear, but math and science are our best means of ascertaining reality by far, which is why even scientists who haven’t been explicitly trained to mitigate their biases are still constrained by the scientific method, which starts with the assumption that you’re wrong.
The few scientists and numerate people I know are rightfully having an existential crisis.
It doesn’t matter if we find another world if we don’t change ourselves first, and this doesn’t end with accepting realities and solutions we don’t want to or irrationally dislike.
We have to recognize that a different way of life is possible, or that working ourselves to death at bullshit jobs so a few billionaires can live parasitic lives isn’t our only option.
We have to accept that our conveniences are an act of violence. This fucking phone was built by Chinese child slave labor, and made from materials that mining and extracting wreaks havoc on ecosystems. For every 100 pounds of stone or earth mined and washed in acid baths, we get a few ounces of usable lithium.
Again, congratulations to the author for writing this book, but it’s more of a religious fairy tale than science fiction, when it could and should have been more like Candide. The setup was there, but instead of sticking the landing it floated off into dreamland. How many more natural disasters and pandemics is it going to take?
It’s already statistically too late, but the answer is that most of us will continue to delude ourselves until we’re directly affected in a catastrophic way, which will happen much sooner than you think if it hasn’t already.
The dialogue was also a bit stilted, melodramatic, and expository.
I was hoping the ending might save this book, and there could have been a great one, but what should have been a dire warning stayed the course of being a farce.
Writing a book, even a bad one, isn’t easy, so two stars for the effort, and I’m glad the author cares about climate change, but this book exemplifies the magical thinking that has led us to the current state of the world.
It’s science fiction, and I’m willing to suspend belief to a point, but this book discusses the consequences of climate change affecting us now as occurring 50 years from now, there is a scientific consensus that we have 7 to 20 years left before the modern world as we know it is lost irretrievably (and as more data pours in, this timeline gets shorter), scientists are not optimistic—one climate scientist set himself on fire—and at the rate NASA continues to be defunded, it’s doubtful that it will exist in 50 years from now even if by some miracle we manage to salvage a few shreds of the modern civilization we’ve taken for granted.
Faith in god is not going to save us, and does humanity really deserve a second chance, or a new planet to destroy?
Scientists question their assumptions and it takes perseverance if you think you’ve almost figured something out, but the numbers and data that run the modern world don’t lie and we’ve had the technology to prevent or at least severely mitigate anthropogenic climate change for over 70 years, but we can’t overcome our irrational fears.
There is a scientific consensus that nuclear power is our best, cheapest, greenest, safest and only viable option as a primary energy source, and a growing consensus that wind and solar are a net loss. What you or I think doesn’t matter.
I analyzed data in graduate school. It didn’t always tell me what I wanted to hear, but math and science are our best means of ascertaining reality by far, which is why even scientists who haven’t been explicitly trained to mitigate their biases are still constrained by the scientific method, which starts with the assumption that you’re wrong.
The few scientists and numerate people I know are rightfully having an existential crisis.
It doesn’t matter if we find another world if we don’t change ourselves first, and this doesn’t end with accepting realities and solutions we don’t want to or irrationally dislike.
We have to recognize that a different way of life is possible, or that working ourselves to death at bullshit jobs so a few billionaires can live parasitic lives isn’t our only option.
We have to accept that our conveniences are an act of violence. This fucking phone was built by Chinese child slave labor, and made from materials that mining and extracting wreaks havoc on ecosystems. For every 100 pounds of stone or earth mined and washed in acid baths, we get a few ounces of usable lithium.
Again, congratulations to the author for writing this book, but it’s more of a religious fairy tale than science fiction, when it could and should have been more like Candide. The setup was there, but instead of sticking the landing it floated off into dreamland. How many more natural disasters and pandemics is it going to take?
It’s already statistically too late, but the answer is that most of us will continue to delude ourselves until we’re directly affected in a catastrophic way, which will happen much sooner than you think if it hasn’t already.
The dialogue was also a bit stilted, melodramatic, and expository.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 34 reviews