Jump to ratings and reviews

INVENTING THE PSYCHOLOGICAL

When and why did it become chic for members of the white middle and upper classes to perceive and value themselves as neurotic, primitive, and emotionally fragile? Is the popular tendency to define the self in psychological language derived from revealed (Freudian) "truths," or does American culture for various purposes invent and promote "emotional" and "psychological" identities?

In this fascinating book, distinguished interdisciplinary scholars show that the ways Americans imagine "innerness" and emotions have been shaped by mass media, economics, domesticity, and the arts. The authors investigate how changes in ideologies of the family, class, race, gender, and sexuality over the past two centuries relate to shifts in Americans' visions of self and psyche; they study "the psychological" as a changing cultural category and "emotions" as historically shifting self-definitions. Their compelling topics include how the Romantic idea of "moods" was appropriated by nineteenth-century female authors of sentimental fiction; how black jazz musicians have responded to white interpretations of African-American jazz as emotionally and aesthetically "deep"; and whether women's confessions of victimization on the Oprah Winfrey Show are akin to 1970s feminist consciousness-raising groups. Provocative and timely, the book challenges the premises of psychohistory and the dominant ways in which Americans have been taught to conceptualize the making of psychological and emotional life.

345 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1997

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Joel Pfister

11 books

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (16%)
4 stars
2 (33%)
3 stars
0 (0%)
2 stars
3 (50%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Greta.
7 reviews25 followers
February 19, 2008
a lot of interesting essays, just not as helpful as I wanted it to be for my purposes. largely post-freudian frame, in a historical sense-- it doesn't think about "the psychological" in American pre-20th century. lots of class critique of therapeutic and pseudo-therapeutic cultures, mostly banal. Some interesting essays, though (Oedipus in America, and the essay on women's speech, victimization and Oprah by Nudelman or whomever).
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review