What do you think?
Rate this book


50 pages, PDF
Published January 1, 2012
There are many debates, and considerable controversy, on the distinctions among outputs, outcomes, and impact. A generally useful approach is to consider outputs as the particular goods or services provided by an intervention (for example, nutrition supplements), whereas an outcome is usefully thought of as benefits of that particular good or service to the target population (such as improved nutrition intake), and impact refers to evidence on whether outcomes are actually changing beneficiary behavior or longer-term conditions of interest (for example, improved eating habits, a healthier population). The key is to distinguish between the provision of goods and services (which involves supply-side activities) and actual demand for and/or utilization of those goods and services (demand-side response).This book does include further treatment of impacts, or at least not mentioned as such. The interesting and intriguing distinction between supply-side activities and demand-side responses is another curious omission from the rest of the book.
1. Establish Strategic Objective(s) for the Problem(s) to Be Addressed;The final section on Challenges feels rushed and somewhat disappointing. It is worth pointing out that in 2015, specialists pointed out that:
2. Identify and Work with Stakeholders, in which the identification of key stakeholder types opr parties is particularly important;
3. Define Results (Outputs and Outcomes);
4. Identify Critical Assumptions and Risks;
5. Review Available Data Sources and Specify Indicators;
6. Assign Indicators and Data Sources for Each Level of Result, which briefly but importantly highlights the importance of choosing a minimal number of indicators and the usefulness of existing proxy indicators;
7. Establish the Performance Monitoring Plan.
...a recent learning review of our validation of CAS completion reports (replaced by Completion and Learning Reviews) identified weaknesses in many of the results frameworks reviewed over time, including: a focus on inputs and outputs rather than outcomes; poor M&E systems, including indicators that do not "fit" associated objectives; and, perhaps most importantly, weak results chains.I am sure there are more recent and possibly more complete book on either this framework or more recent evidence-based frameworks, but this is a good concise but preliminary introduction to key issues in designing interventions for SDGs, especially for students unfamiliar with with the field of socio-economic aid through interventions. The book downplays the importance of building a dynamic model based on feedback cycles, a necessary step for more serious use. If you are interested in this area and are a newcomer to it, I would recommend you explore the Univeristy of the Witwatersrand (Wits University) edX MOOC on Theory of Change.
Designing an effective operational results chain is possibly the most critical and challenging task in developing the results framework for a country strategy. The results chain is intended to present a logical statement of how planned WBG interventions will lead to the realization of objectives, beginning with inputs, moving through activities and outputs, culminating in outcomes, impacts, and feedback. A well designed results chain identifies risks and makes explicit any underlying assumptions about client (government) or other stakeholder (e.g., firms, CSOs, communities) actions. A clearly constructed, logical results chain is critical to accountability, mid-course correction, and learning, and is also integral to exercising selectivity.