THE FINAL PRODUCTION OF WATTS' "EPISCOPALIAN PRIEST" DAYS
Alan Wilson Watts (1915-1973) was a British-born philosopher, writer, and speaker, best known as a populariser of Eastern philosophy. He and his then-wife left England for America in 1938 on the eve of WWII, and he became an Episcopal priest---but he left the priesthood in 1950 and moved to California, where he became a cult figure in the Beat movement of the 1950s and later.
This book, however, was published in 1950, shortly before he left the priesthood. He is still professing (publicly, at least) Episcopalianism, as he says, "A very strong case can be made for the truth of the orthodox Christian belief, but the proper statement of the arguments in its favor would take up so large a part of the book as to carry it far beyond the purpose of the series of works to which it belongs. This purpose is to tell the stories of the great religious festivals, not to arrive at historical judgments about them." (Pg. 10) But he also suggests, "we have become stuffy and stodgy and given to religious observances which are both brief and dull..." (Pg. 56-57)
He admits, "Perhaps there is no HISTORICAL connection between the modern Easter egg and the World-egg of ancient mythology. Indeed, there are no records of the use of Easter eggs in Western Europe before the fifteenth century, although the custom of coloring eggs at Easter has been found in an African tribe once Christian but long since converted to [Islam]." (Pg. 29)
He observes, "we are told by an ancient English chronicler, the Venerable Bede, that the word 'Easter' was originally the name of an Anglo-Saxon goddess of the dawn, known as Eostre or Ostara, whose principal festival was kept at the vernal equinox. We have only Bede's word for it, for no record of such a goddess is to be found elsewhere, but it is unlikely that Bede, as a devout Christian, would have gone out of his way to invent a pagan origin for Easter. But whether or not there ever was such a goddess, it seems most likely that some historical connection must exist between the words 'Easter' and 'East,' where the sun rises." (Pg. 36)
He acknowledges, "It is probable, then, that the Christian Easter has absorbed many of the ancient rites and observances associated, not only with the sun, but also with the fertility of the soil." (Pg. 39) Later, he states, "when a religion such as Christianity comes to a people from outside, it adopts and 'baptizes' some of the folk customs which derive from older religions. It selects and weaves into the liturgy folk observances which seem to signify the same eternal principles taught by the Church." (Pg. 117)
He summarizes, "the story of Jesus lives on, not because he was an innocent man who died a cruel death with bravery... not because he was a great teacher of spiritual principles... not even because he returned from death, for that, too, has been recorded of others. The Christ story lives because it has fascinated man's mind with the thought of a God who has shared the life of his creatures, or a King who has become his own subject." (Pg. 84)
This book of Watts will probably bore those who prefer his earlier and later "Eastern" books; but it remains of interest to those interested in the Christian background of Easter.