Hyde, Daniel. R. With Heart and Mouth: An Exposition of the Belgic Confession. Grandville, MI: Reformed Fellowship, Inc., 2008.
Introduction
A confessing church must always be confessing. It is with that in mind that we welcome Daniel Hyde’s exposition of the Belgic Confession, one of the “Three Forms of Unity.” Like the Confession itself, Hyde gives a clear presentation of the gospel and the church. Hyde’s earlier books on baptism, the Reformed church service, and Reformed liturgy have helped impress upon his readers the fact that the Reformed faith is more than the five points of Calvinism. This book is no exception. Echoing, consciously or unconsciously, Michael Horton’s works, Hyde structures his work around the “dramatis personae who takes center stage in Scripture,” with Act 1 as Creation, Act 2 as Fall, Act 3 as Redemption, and Act 4 as Consummation (Hyde 263-264).
God
After a brief account of the life of Guy de Bres, the Confession’s primary author, Hyde, like the Confession itself, begins with God. The Confession’s God–and that of the historic church–is simple: “We all believe with the heart and confess with the mouth that there is only one simple and spiritual Being, which we call God” (BC 1). Hyde wrote this a decade or so before biblicism began to really spread in the Reformed churches, which makes his exposition all the more important. By anchoring theology with the being of God, the Confession, and the historic church, is able to move to the attributes and the Trinity. On a more pastoral level, by beginning with God we are reminded that all of our theology must begin with God (Hyde 36).
Such an account of God, though, is not enough. From here Hyde moves to our knowledge of God, which is ectypal and analogical. Because we are finite and of a different order of being than God, our knowledge is always a copy and an accommodation of God’s knowledge. Moreover, it is analogical because we cannot read our finite concepts back into God himself. There is a pastoral aspect to ectypal knowledge as well: Hyde reminds us that “We have a copy that he has made for us so that we might know him as pilgrims in the wilderness” (39).
From the knowledge of God we move to Holy Scripture, and it is interesting, at least for someone from the Westminster tradition, to see that the Belgic Confession, although it begins with the doctrine of God, spends a substantial time on Scripture (BC 6-9). Hyde reviews the standard arguments, the Roman Catholic and Anabaptist positions, and the Reformed response to it.
His discussion of the Trinity is standard material, but he does mention a few points that are worth hearing in light of the twentieth century’s so-called “Trinitarian revival.” For example, even though there are Persons in the Trinity, a divine Person is not the same as a human person. This might sound obvious, but it has not stopped moderns from reading finite limitations and imperfections into the Godhead. There are relations in the Godhead, but that does not mean God is a “relational being,” always waiting and responding, perhaps even changing, dialoguing with his creation. By contrast, the church has always confessed that we distinguish the persons, at least at the most basic level, by “their incommunicable properties; namely, the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit” (Hyde 117). Full stop. Admittedly, such a take does not tell us how to structure our political communities nor give advice on the authority relations between husband and wife. That is the point. We are dealing with divine mysteries, and our language, as noted earlier, must be analogical.
Salvation
If justification by faith alone is the hinge of religion, it is also the hinge of this book, signifying a shift from earlier treatments of God and the world to what God has done for us in Christ. For starters, “our Lord’s accomplished work for us in his priestly ministry upon the cross is the ‘ground,’ or the foundation, of our salvation” (289). It is not just a description of faith alone; rather, Hyde focuses on “the justice by which we stand before God.” Drawing upon the work of R. Scott Clark, Hyde makes clear that we receive a “double grace” when we partake of Christ, allowing us to approach God as a gracious Father rather than a harsh judge (290; cf. Clark, Caspar Olevian and the Substance of the Covenant).
Church
Hyde does a nice job in recovering the churchly piety of the Reformers. He rebukes the practice of having soloists in church (451), reminding us instead “of the people’s praise to the Lord, not the individuals.” Of similar importance is the hearing of the law, confession of sin, and speaking the absolution, not that the minister has power of himself to forgive sins. But rather that God in Christ is forgiving us. Hyde warns us not to overreact to perceived Catholicism in a way that removes us from actual Reformed practice.
Conclusion
This is an excellent volume and is nicely formatted for personal study and Sunday School classes. The questions at the end of each chapter particularly aid in discussion.