What do you think?
Rate this book
Privacy in Peril: Hunter v Southam and the Drift from Reasonable Search Protections
In 1984, the Supreme Court of Canada, in Hunter v Southam, declared warrantless searches unreasonable under section 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Police would henceforth require authorization based on “reasonable and probable grounds.” The decision promised to protect individuals from state power, but as Richard Jochelson and David Ireland argue, post-Hunter search and seizure law took a turn away from the landmark decision. An examination of dozens of post-Hunter cases reveals that Justice Dickson’s vision has been diminished in an era of heightened security and expanding police powers.
244 pages, Kindle Edition
Published November 1, 2019
1 person is currently reading
3 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
April 12, 2025
As Canada prepares for some turbulent times south of the border, it would be remiss not to talk about some of the political fallout within our own borders as well. An election has been set for April 2025 and I wanted to do a little Election Prep for Canada, as I have done for US presidential elections in years past. We have a prime minister who has resigned due to some really poor polling numbers and a salivating Leader of the Opposition wanting to topple the tower right away for his own benefit. This entire experience could be extra fun, as there are whispers from high in Washington that the upcoming election could be the last for Canada as a sovereign country before we become the 51st state. Let’s see where this reading journey takes us!
As I continue looking into important and impactful legal cases that have arisen in Canada, I could not ignore this short tome by Richard Jochelson and David Ireland. It explores the evolution of reasonable search and seizure in Canada, particularly since the Charter came into play. Citing a landmark Supreme Court case, Hunter v Southam, the authors argue that the bar was set by Chief Justice Brian Dickson, but then there was a significant drift away from the established set of rules. This tome, while technical at times, offers the reader a great insight into privacy protection and the individual rights in Canada.
The Supreme Court of Canada made history in 1984, when it ruled on Hunter v Southam with Chief Justice Brian Dickson writing the decision. The case explores warrantless searches, finding them unreasonable under section 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This ruling laid the groundwork for police to use “reasonable and probable grounds” to execute their searches, thereby protecting the rights of the individual. This created a significant loophole for many legal proceedings, as the authors argue, permitting a number of people to use the Hunter rule to circumvent prosecution for criminal actions.
In the years that followed, the debate over individual and collective rights came up repeatedly, with the police in the middle. As the authors discuss, the right to privacy took a back seat, or at least moved to being as important as the greater whole. Searches remained in place, but with a strict structure around them and their use. The latter portion of the book tackles some interesting arguments about searches in the heat of the moment or without warrant, whose importance is key in Canadian jurisprudence, but also with a tight leash to protect the individual's rights. This is surely a thorny subject and the authors show how the courts have had to tackle it with much difficulty after the Charter foundation came into place.
As Richard Jochelson and David Ireland argue effectively, a new era created laws that sought to develop a less reactionary Court and towards one that simply enforced what was laid out before it. This curtailed the need for proactive constitutional interpretation. This would serve to shape many core constitutional values for decades to come, while shelving the needs of the individual quite abruptly. The Court sought to protect the larger whole with thorough enforcement of laws, which helped push elected officials and, eventually, the courts to look past Hunter and towards a more collective set of legal values. The tenets of the 1984 Court dissipated, leaving search and seizure laws in the hands of the police to push away from individual rights.
While the subject matter can be a bit intense, Jochelson and Ireland provide the reader with a stellar analysis of the facts they garnered from numerous cases of search and seizure, using both the Hunter rule and newer interpretations of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The discussion is thorough and captivating to the reader with an interest in the subject matter. Each chapter is well-documented and full of analysis, as well as references for the reader to better understand what is going on. The authors offer up their own sentiments about the progression of Charter rules on search and seizure, as well as what the Courts have been doing to change from the early Hunter rules. A great book and highly educational as I seek to better understand all things legal in Canada, with an election looming and complete breakdown of legal and constitutional limits south of the Canadian border!
Kudos, Messrs. Jochelson and Ireland, for a great piece that kept me thinking.
Like/hate the review? An ever-growing collection of others appears at:
http://pecheyponderings.wordpress.com/
As I continue looking into important and impactful legal cases that have arisen in Canada, I could not ignore this short tome by Richard Jochelson and David Ireland. It explores the evolution of reasonable search and seizure in Canada, particularly since the Charter came into play. Citing a landmark Supreme Court case, Hunter v Southam, the authors argue that the bar was set by Chief Justice Brian Dickson, but then there was a significant drift away from the established set of rules. This tome, while technical at times, offers the reader a great insight into privacy protection and the individual rights in Canada.
The Supreme Court of Canada made history in 1984, when it ruled on Hunter v Southam with Chief Justice Brian Dickson writing the decision. The case explores warrantless searches, finding them unreasonable under section 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This ruling laid the groundwork for police to use “reasonable and probable grounds” to execute their searches, thereby protecting the rights of the individual. This created a significant loophole for many legal proceedings, as the authors argue, permitting a number of people to use the Hunter rule to circumvent prosecution for criminal actions.
In the years that followed, the debate over individual and collective rights came up repeatedly, with the police in the middle. As the authors discuss, the right to privacy took a back seat, or at least moved to being as important as the greater whole. Searches remained in place, but with a strict structure around them and their use. The latter portion of the book tackles some interesting arguments about searches in the heat of the moment or without warrant, whose importance is key in Canadian jurisprudence, but also with a tight leash to protect the individual's rights. This is surely a thorny subject and the authors show how the courts have had to tackle it with much difficulty after the Charter foundation came into place.
As Richard Jochelson and David Ireland argue effectively, a new era created laws that sought to develop a less reactionary Court and towards one that simply enforced what was laid out before it. This curtailed the need for proactive constitutional interpretation. This would serve to shape many core constitutional values for decades to come, while shelving the needs of the individual quite abruptly. The Court sought to protect the larger whole with thorough enforcement of laws, which helped push elected officials and, eventually, the courts to look past Hunter and towards a more collective set of legal values. The tenets of the 1984 Court dissipated, leaving search and seizure laws in the hands of the police to push away from individual rights.
While the subject matter can be a bit intense, Jochelson and Ireland provide the reader with a stellar analysis of the facts they garnered from numerous cases of search and seizure, using both the Hunter rule and newer interpretations of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The discussion is thorough and captivating to the reader with an interest in the subject matter. Each chapter is well-documented and full of analysis, as well as references for the reader to better understand what is going on. The authors offer up their own sentiments about the progression of Charter rules on search and seizure, as well as what the Courts have been doing to change from the early Hunter rules. A great book and highly educational as I seek to better understand all things legal in Canada, with an election looming and complete breakdown of legal and constitutional limits south of the Canadian border!
Kudos, Messrs. Jochelson and Ireland, for a great piece that kept me thinking.
Like/hate the review? An ever-growing collection of others appears at:
http://pecheyponderings.wordpress.com/
Displaying 1 of 1 review