Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Targeted Regulatory Writing Techniques: Clinical Documents for Drugs and Biologics

Rate this book
This book describes the authors’ standard or ‘best’ practices used in writing regul- ed clinical documents for the drug and biologics industry. The fundamental premise of this book is that the end (documents submitted to a health authority) is dep- dent on the beginning (the planning and strategy that go into organizing written documentation). Each regulatory document inherently exists within a constellation of related documents. This book attempts to show the relationships between and among these documents and suggests strategies for organizing and writing these documents to maximize ef?ciency while developing clear and concise text. At all times, and irrespective of applicable laws and guidelines, good communication skills and a sense of balance are essential to adequately, accurately, and clearly describe a product’s characteristics. At no time should the reader perceive these suggestions to be the only viable solution to writing regulatory documents nor should the reader expect that these suggestions guarantee product success. The audience for this book is the novice medical writer, or those who would like to explore or enhance regulatory-writing skills. We assume the reader will have a basic understanding of written communication, but little experience in applying this skill to the task of regulatory writing. Extensive knowledge of science, clinical me- cine, mathematics, or regulatory affairs law is not required to use the best practices described in this book.

248 pages, Paperback

First published November 5, 2008

14 people want to read

About the author

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
11 (57%)
4 stars
5 (26%)
3 stars
3 (15%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
158 reviews
December 16, 2024
Really helpful for the big picture of why and also for the key little details. I hope it still holds up after ~15 years! Though why they can’t clarify that the CTD is the basis of both the IND and the NDA is beyond me.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.