What do you think?
Rate this book
The My Lai massacre in American history and memory
On 16 March 1968, two US infantry companies entered a Vietnamese village and in the course of a single morning killed over 400 of its unarmed, unresisting inhabitants . . .
This is the first book to examine the response of American society to the My Lai massacre and its ambiguous place in American national memory. Kendrick Oliver argues that the massacre revelations left many Americans untroubled. It was only when the soldiers most immediately responsible came to be tried that opposition to the conflict grew, for these prosecutions were regarded by supporters of the war as evidence that the national leaders no longer had the will to do what was necessary to win.
Oliver goes on to show that, contrary to interpretations of the Vietnam conflict as an unhealed national trauma or wound, many Americans have assimilated the war and its violence rather too well, and they were able to do so even when that violence was most conspicuous and current. US soldiers have been presented as the conflict’s principal victims, and this was true even in the case of My Lai. It was the American perpetrators of the massacre and not the Vietnamese they brutalized who became the central object of popular concern. Both the massacre and its reception reveal the problem of human empathy in conditions of a counter-revolutionary war – a war, moreover, that had always been fought for geopolitical credibility, not for the sake of the Vietnamese.
This incisive enquiry into the moral history of the Vietnam war should be essential reading for all students of the conflict, as well as others interested in the war and its cultural legacies.
This is the first book to examine the response of American society to the My Lai massacre and its ambiguous place in American national memory. Kendrick Oliver argues that the massacre revelations left many Americans untroubled. It was only when the soldiers most immediately responsible came to be tried that opposition to the conflict grew, for these prosecutions were regarded by supporters of the war as evidence that the national leaders no longer had the will to do what was necessary to win.
Oliver goes on to show that, contrary to interpretations of the Vietnam conflict as an unhealed national trauma or wound, many Americans have assimilated the war and its violence rather too well, and they were able to do so even when that violence was most conspicuous and current. US soldiers have been presented as the conflict’s principal victims, and this was true even in the case of My Lai. It was the American perpetrators of the massacre and not the Vietnamese they brutalized who became the central object of popular concern. Both the massacre and its reception reveal the problem of human empathy in conditions of a counter-revolutionary war – a war, moreover, that had always been fought for geopolitical credibility, not for the sake of the Vietnamese.
This incisive enquiry into the moral history of the Vietnam war should be essential reading for all students of the conflict, as well as others interested in the war and its cultural legacies.
320 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2006
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review
April 23, 2012
Although Oliver's book is not an easy read, I found his exploration of memory to be really interesting from a historian's perspective. I'm less convinced when he wanders off into psycho-analysis, but his treatment of media coverage of the My Lai (Son My) massacre is particularly engaging. Oliver argues that narratives focusing on the 'real' victims of the American War in Vietnam--namely the inhabitants of the region--have been displaced in American popular memory in favor of those that highlight American experiences. Oliver uses My Lai as a kind of case study to examine the various processes that enabled this displacement. I doubt many people will look kindly on his section related to PTSD (which he claims is a kind of fictional disorder that allows veterans to overcome their feelings guilt by focussing on themselves rather than their victims), but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. I could probably tally on one hand the number of books that I've found 100 percent convincing.
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review