2017 review
This book is toxic. It is what NOT to do in Bible interpretation. It's not just a little bit twisted. It is horrific. Run. Get away. Burn your copy. Remember the author's name and avoid anything he's written. It is truly terrifying, and deeply heartbreaking, that this book ever made it to print and that some people actually admit to approaching the Bible in the way this book describes. It is high treason against heaven and earth to do so and I am convinced many will suffer the greater condemnation for such wickedness as this book proposes.
In 2023, I was asked to elaborate on this review and will copy some of that here for any who might find it beneficial:
I opened the book up to refresh my memory and it fell to ch. 20, "Numbers in the Bible." This chapter is full of superstition masked as interpretation. He goes into the meaning of numbers and their derivatives. E.g. "In the Bible the number 9 stands for finality and judgement. It has similarities to the number six (3+3=6 and 3x3=9). The sum of the twenty-two letters which make up the Hebrew alphabet is 4,995 (5x999) so that the Hebrew alphabet is thus stamped with grace and finality." This has no value for understanding the Bible and is nothing short of biblical numerology.
The next chapter focuses on the hidden meanings of names and titles. The next chapter is "Christ, the Ultimate Key" where he spends the final four odd pages of his book trying to act like Jesus was central to it, even though he's hardly come up so far.
A quick flip through the rest of the book brought up KJV-onlyism, teaching dispensationalism as the only acceptable view, teaching the imputation of inherent righteousness rather than alien (Jesus') righteousness, works salvation, suffering necessarily implies God's judgement, his view of typology is untethered to any biblical evidence which means he tells us to see whatever we want to as a type. His writing is illogical, anti-intellectual, superstitious, and full of guesses and assumptions. He doesn't understand how the original languages relate to each other. He doesn't understand semantics or lexicography or genre or syntax or any of the key disciplines required to teach hermeneutics. My review probably sounds a bit hysterical, but genuinely, it's just an awful, awful guide.