尼采

by Gilles Deleuze, 王紹中 (Translator)

法國當代重量級思想大師──德勒茲（Gilles Deleuze）作品：《尼采》全新中文譯本面市

法國思想巨擘傅柯：「未來將是德勒茲的世紀。」

透過本書不僅能─窺德勒茲如何以其靈魂之眼剖析尼采哲學的精髓，更能識見德勒茲對於哲學研究的獨闢蹊徑，如何為後續者傾注一道光亮，帶領世人探索思想的新疆域，進而對當代哲學產生深遠的影響。

【內容簡介】

尼采曾說：哲學家經常「向未來伸出創造性的手」──未來之哲學家即為立法者。尼采曾提出「上帝已死」、「主人─奴隸道德說」、「永恆回歸」、「超人」及「權力意志」等創見概念，並對諸多知識領域發出批判，他的思想深具影響力，卻也讓當代哲學界爭論不休。尼采為何成為對後世深具影響力的哲學家？而究竟要用什麼角度解讀尼采思想，又如何才不會誤讀尼采的作品？

已故法國重量級思想大師─德勒茲（Gilles Deleuze）在《尼釆》這本小書中，除了針對尼采哲學有深刻的分析外，為使尼采的思想脈絡更清晰，亦詳盡介紹尼采生平、爬梳整理了尼采作品主要角色說明，並收錄由德勒茲所挑選出的尼采文摘。透過德勒茲的詮釋，對尼采這位哲學大師的思想面貌，將會有更全面的認識。

【作者簡介】

110 pages, Kindle Edition

Published November 23, 2018

About the author

Deleuze is a key figure in poststructuralist French philosophy. Considering himself an empiricist and a vitalist, his body of work, which rests upon concepts such as multiplicity, constructivism, difference and desire, stands at a substantial remove from the main traditions of 20th century Continental thought. His thought locates him as an influential figure in present-day considerations of society, creativity and subjectivity. Notably, within his metaphysics he favored a Spinozian concept of a plane of immanence with everything a mode of one substance, and thus on the same level of existence. He argued, then, that there is no good and evil, but rather only relationships which are beneficial or harmful to the particular individuals. This ethics influences his approach to society and politics, especially as he was so politically active in struggles for rights and freedoms. Later in his career he wrote some of the more infamous texts of the period, in particular, Anti-Oedipus and A Thousand Plateaus. These texts are collaborative works with the radical psychoanalyst Félix Guattari, and they exhibit Deleuze’s social and political commitment.

Gilles Deleuze began his career with a number of idiosyncratic yet rigorous historical studies of figures outside of the Continental tradition in vogue at the time. His first book, Empirisism and Subjectivity, is a study of Hume, interpreted by Deleuze to be a radical subjectivist. Deleuze became known for writing about other philosophers with new insights and different readings, interested as he was in liberating philosophical history from the hegemony of one perspective. He wrote on Spinoza, Nietzche, Kant, Leibniz and others, including literary authors and works, cinema, and art. Deleuze claimed that he did not write “about” art, literature, or cinema, but, rather, undertook philosophical “encounters” that led him to new concepts. As a constructivist, he was adamant that philosophers are creators, and that each reading of philosophy, or each philosophical encounter, ought to inspire new concepts. Additionally, according to Deleuze and his concepts of difference, there is no identity, and in repetition, nothing is ever the same. Rather, there is only difference: copies are something new, everything is constantly changing, and reality is a becoming, not a being.

He often collaborated with philosophers and artists as Félix Guattari, Michel Foucault, Guy Hocquenghem, René Schérer, Carmelo Bene, François Châtelet, Olivier Revault d'Allonnes, Jean-François Lyotard, Georges Lapassade, Kateb Yacine and many others.