This might have seemed, some years or decades ago, a merely mediocre guide to Haydn, but now, with the abundance of publications and internet resources available, it feels outright disappointing. First published in 1950, but then reissued a quarter-century later in a (only slightly) updated version to take into account the major strides in Haydn scholarship, it aims to first give an account of the composer’s life, and then explore his work as broken down into categories (keyboard works, string quartet, symphonies, opera).
All this in just 201 pages. Consequently, the section on Haydn’s life – merely a retelling of hoary 19th-century biographies of the composer – is given in an extremely rushed and breathless tone. I almost felt dizzy at reading it! The part on Haydn’s music has some interesting trivia and many samples from the scores, but it abounds in problems. Firstly, one gets the impression that many developments in Haydn studies are only vaguely acknowledged in the updated 1977 edition, but not actually integrated into the book. Secondly, so much of these chapters consist of Hughes’ opinions of the works, especially the symphonies. Her ideas of which works are better and which are worse are rather subjective, and besides, general opinions have also shifted over time – it’s remarkable from the perspective of 2025 to hear La Passione described as immature! For Hughes, everything culminates in the “London Symphonies”, such that prior works get short shrift.
Perhaps the best part of the book is the appendices. There’s a list of works, for example, which might draw the reader’s attention to some of Haydn’s most obscure works that rarely get performed or even talked about.