This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
From The Soul of Prayer book description: P. T. Forsyth is sometimes described as an English pre-cursor to Karl Barth. He was born in 1848 to a Scottish family of humble origins and later in life attended Aberdeen University, where he graduated with first-class honours in classical literature in 1869. In 1876 he was ordained and called to minister in Shipley, Yorkshire. In his early ministry in the Congregational Church, Forsyth fought orthodoxy and sought for the right to rethink Christian theology and pursue liberal thought. In 1878, however, Forsyth experienced a conversion from, in his own words, "being a Christian to being a believer, from a lover of love to an object of grace." A profound awareness of pastoral responsibility was awakened which radically altered the the course of his ministry. His conversion thrust him from the leadership of liberalism to a recovery of the theology of grace. Quickly, he became one of the better-known figures in British Nonconformity. In 1894, he received a call to Emmanuel College in Cambridge, where he preached his famous sermon, "Holy Father" in 1896. In 1901, he accepted a position as principal of Hackney Theological College, London where he remained until he died in 1921. Over his lifetime Forsyth published 25 books and more than 260 articles. He is often credited with recovering for his generation the reality and true dimensions of the grace of God.(
I've been meaning for some time to read a book by Forsyth, as I've often enjoyed the references to him by other authors. So this is my first book from this Author. Whilst this is not an easy read, it is very much a worthwhile one. Forsyth is far better at handling the English Language than I am - and I often found that I had to re-read a sentence or paragraph to properly get what was being said. I have had at times a similar "problem" with some of Lewis' works. In fact, I found that reading this book aloud helped me to better grasp what was being said.
Whilst this was written at the end of the 19th Century, it is still very applicable today. The Author deals well with the whole area of Christian Perfection, of what it means to be Righteous because of Christ's death and resurrection. In fact, this is a good, and reasonably short, book on the Atonement and what that means to the daily life of the Christian. Naturally, some of the imagery and language is a little dated - but I didn't find that an issue. I prefer a stronger emphasis on a life of Repentance (being Lutheran does that) than the Author presents - however I still enjoyed his use of language, which swept me away at times :)
Some remarkable insights alongside some potentially dangerous ambiguities. Admirable emphasis on the fact that we find our perfection in the fact that we are now, in one sense, perfectly related to the Father through faith in Christ alone. Forsyth does also recognise that we are by no means complete and that, in another sense, we will not be finally perfect until we are glorified. He does, however, arguably minimise the sense to which we are being perfected by the Holy Spirit's work in us and ought to be demonstrating that if we have truly been brought into such a relationship by faith in Christ. This is perhaps a fault of emphasis rather than intent.