Traces the history of the relationship between religious and secular laws and authorities in Islamic countries, finding that until modern times, Shari'a was rarely the sole law of the land, but either ran in parallel with a secular legal system or was relegated to the fringes. This began to change with European pressure on Islamic countries to codify their laws in order to facilitate trade and with nationalistic responses to colonialism. Zubaida argues that this process has resulted in a harsher application of Shari'a and, in particular, more frequent imposition of the hudud punishments than was historically the case. Zubaida's argument depends partly on classifying siyasa as secular rather than Islamic, which is a contested view. The book is an interesting read, but I found it heavy going at times.