Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

International Relations' Last Synthesis?: Decoupling Constructivist and Critical Approaches

Rate this book
Many scholars, intentionally or unintentionally, have entangled constructivisms and critical theories in problematic ways, either by assigning a critical-theoretical politics to constructivisms or by assuming the appropriateness of constructivist epistemology and methods for critical theorizing. IR's Last Synthesis? makes the argument that these connections mirror IR's grand theoretical syntheses of the 1980s and 1990s and have similar constraining effects on the possibilities of IR theory. They have been made without adequate reflection, in contradiction to the base assumptions of each theoretical perspective, and to the detriment of both knowledge accumulation about global politics and theoretical rigor in disciplinary IR. It is not that constructivisms and critical theories have no common ground; rather, the fact that it has become routine for IR scholars to overstate their common ground is counterproductive to the discovery and utilization of their potential dialogues. To that end, IR's Last Synthesis? argues that scholars using the two in conjunction should be cognizant of, rather than gloss over, the tensions between the approaches and the tools they have to offer. Along these lines, the book uses the concept of affordances to look at what each has to offer the other, and to argue for a modest, reflective, specified return to (constructivist and critical) IR theorizing. By rejecting its over-simple syntheses, this book hews a road toward reviving IR theorizing.

232 pages, Kindle Edition

Published February 12, 2019

1 person is currently reading
9 people want to read

About the author

J. Samuel Barkin

14 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (16%)
4 stars
2 (33%)
3 stars
2 (33%)
2 stars
1 (16%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for KimNica.
73 reviews1 follower
December 29, 2023
The main argument of this book could have been an article: "Constructivism and critical theory are fundamentally different - do not treat them as similar or attempt to synthesize them". Given that the message is simple the book feels overly lengthy at times. However, it is still very useful for its careful articulation and differentiation of different constructivisms and different critical theories. I would recommend it on those grounds.
It also provides a broad overview of works about IR theory in general if that is what you are looking for.
Profile Image for Sara.
394 reviews71 followers
Read
April 26, 2022
Tenttikirja. Voisin vielä kirjoitella ajatuksia tänne tarkemmin, kun olen käynyt muistiinpanot läpi. Sehän on hyvää harjoitusta tenttiäkin varten!! Olen kyllä niin viksu!
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews