Jump to ratings and reviews

Contes et entretiens

Quel est le statut de l'individu dans le couple (Ceci n'est pas un conte) ? Le sage doit-il toujours respecter la loi (Entretien d'un père avec ses enfants) ? La morale peut-elle se passer de fondement religieux (Entretien d'un philosophe avec Madame la Maréchale de***) ?... Dans les récits brefs et piquants qu'il rédige entre 1768 et 1774, Diderot s'inspire d'anecdotes et de personnages réels pour interroger les moeurs de son temps et mettre à mal l'édifice vermoulu des conventions sociales. Faisant du conte un laboratoire de morale expérimentale, il aborde les questions du mariage, de l'infidélité, de la condition féminine, de la vertu ou encore de l'athéisme, et invite le lecteur à rassembler ces fragments d'histoires et de dialogues pour tenter de saisir la vérité toujours mouvante de l'humain.

254 pages, Pocket Book

Published April 5, 2013

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Denis Diderot

2,545 books610 followers
Work on the Encyclopédie (1751-1772), supreme accomplishment of French philosopher and writer Denis Diderot, epitomized the spirit of thought of Enlightenment; he also wrote novels, plays, critical essays, and brilliant letters to a wide circle of friends and colleagues.

Jean le Rond d'Alembert contributed.

This artistic prominent persona served as best known co-founder, chief editor, and contributor.

He also contributed notably to literature with Jacques le fataliste et son maître (Jacques the Fatalist and his Master), which emulated Laurence Sterne in challenging conventions regarding structure and content, while also examining ideas about free will. Diderot also authored of the known dialogue, Le Neveu de Rameau (Rameau's Nephew), basis of many articles and sermons about consumer desire. His articles included many topics.

Diderot speculated on free will, held a completely materialistic view of the universe, and suggested that heredity determines all human behavior. He therefore warned his fellows against an overemphasis on mathematics and against the blind optimism that sees in the growth of physical knowledge an automatic social and human progress. He rejected the idea of progress. His opinion doomed the aim of progressing through technology to fail. He founded on experiment and the study of probabilities. He wrote several articles and supplements concerning gambling, mortality rates, and inoculation against smallpox. He discreetly but firmly refuted technical errors and personal positions of d'Alembert on probability.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
0 (0%)
4 stars
6 (27%)
3 stars
8 (36%)
2 stars
6 (27%)
1 star
2 (9%)
No one has reviewed this book yet.